User talk:Divyam Seth
Here you can communicate with me and I will be happy to provide my feed back as early as possible. Thanks Divyam Seth
Hello Divyam seth. I didn't add content in "Bhim" i.e. Bhima. I just did "undo". It was just a basic point. You removed it. It actually didn't require any citations. Like it was fact. If you feel it's not necessary you can remove it but you didn't answer my doubt. What is vandalism? Is it something like controversial or dispute kind of thing? By the way this is "Fire star on heat". Hope you will explain me. You are a member of wikipedia right?
- Hello Fire star on heat, Original research are not allowed in Wikipedia, and content published on wikipedia must be verifiable. Your sentence was removed from lead paragraph as notability of the sentence was not established, ie. information should comes from a reliable source. - Divyam Seth (talk) 06:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bargarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rohini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
What does this mean?
[edit]I’m confused by this edit on the Ravana page: “It is a matter of fact that the demon tendency was filled in Ravana”
What are you trying to say here? That Ravana had some kind of inherent evil nature from being a demon?
Dronebogus (talk) 18:44, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
I added a proper reference. Kindly go through it. Read it from p 130 to p133 in the reference. Please dont unnecessarily delete the content. Kindly got through this. Fan of Mahabharat (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- I read the reference you added in the article and confirmed the reference doesn't supports what you have mentioned in the article. hence, its is reverted again. Divyam Seth (talk) 08:05, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Read citation once again. In the lines p 131 and p 132 Fan of Mahabharat (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
I will send you screen shots if necessary Fan of Mahabharat (talk) 08:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hello Fan of Mahabharat, Wikipedia articles cannot be based upon primary sources alone, and sacred texts are primary sources. The articles should also cite secondary sources, like scholarly research done on the subject. but you are indulged in a edit war, which is not acceptable. if you are not agree with anything, try to build a WP:Consensus in talk page of the same article. Divyam Seth (talk) 13:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
It's ok Divyam seth. I apologize. Sorry for my edits. Fan of Mahabharat (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Now please kindly excuse me. I won't repeat next time. Please read this and hope I will get clear of all. Fan of Mahabharat (talk) 15:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of Lokadrusti College
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Lokadrusti College, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 16:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Dear User:onel5969 The Page was deleted by the admin within few hours of placing the tags of speedy deletion. Even I didn't get any chance to 'Contest speedy deletion' or to explain my side. The page was related to an educational institute and I don't think it should be deleted. Divyam Seth (talk) 05:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
It is not a requirement to wait for a speedy deletion to be contested.
If you have a conflict of interest with regard to this college, you must declare it. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:
- you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. Most of your sources were to the college, connected sites or were clearly written by the college, such as the Ind Career spam. We require independent third-party sources
- The college seems to have no staff, students or exam results, as far as you tell us, so it's hard to see why it's notable. I'm also unclear why its distance from a police station is relevant.
- You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your text was classic spam, a bit of history, the courses you offer and no real facts. Also obvious promo like the institution has grown leaps and bounds and has successfully carved a niche for itself... working for the poor communities...
- There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. Parts of your text were copied verbatim from at least here. For legal reasons we do not restore copyright violations
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. I don't have any COI with Lokadrusti College. I do agree with the points you have mentioned and understand I should give more time to improve the article before publishing. I will be careful next time. Regards.Divyam Seth (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.
[edit]Hi Divyam_Seth! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 19 June 2023 (UTC)