Jump to content

User talk:DilipFraser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, DilipFraser. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Happy Science, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, bonadea. I am sorry for the doubts I have caused you. I am a student studying new religions in the Asian region and have nothing to do with the organization. I came up with the addition because I noticed that the amount of information in this English version of the article was so much less than in the Japanese version.
All additions were translations of the Japanese version of the article. I will take care to follow Wikipedia's content policy.
Thank you. DilipFraser (talk) 02:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Happy Science. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please use the article talk page to make edit requests, as described above. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, bonadea. I hesitate to say this, but I am a little confused by your response. Could you please point out what is disruptive in my editing? Thank you. DilipFraser (talk) 10:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonadea - See DilipFraser's response above. Pinging you as a courtesy so that you can offer assistance to this editor. :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Restoring the organisation's own propaganda after having been directly asked not to do so is disruptive. Articles in Wikipedias in other languages may contain information that is useful in English Wikipedia, or they may not; English Wikipedia does not, for instance, allow editors to draw our own conclusions from sources. Many users representing Happy Science have added content defending their organisation to the article, giving as their reason for doing so that the text (such as their "legal battle" against Kodansha) comes from Japanese Wikipedia. Again, if there are reliably sourced and neutral pieces of information that could be added, please post edit requests at the article talk page (as described above). --bonadea contributions talk 19:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see... it is a complicated situation. I thought I understood that the organization's propaganda should not be included in the article. Therefore, from my last edit, I thought I had carefully excluded the information that the organization sent out.... From your explanation and behavior, I am not sure of the criteria for deciding what may and may not be included in this article. I am sorry to realize that I cannot publish the text I have taken the trouble to translate.  Having said that, thank you for your time. DilipFraser (talk) 08:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 11:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, DilipFraser! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the review! I will try to find a more reliable source. Also, thank you for letting me know about Teahouse. It would be very helpful. Thank you! DilipFraser (talk) 02:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, DilipFraser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Japan Theravada Buddhist Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]