User talk:ChurCuz

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

One-revert restriction:
Until 02 April 2024, you are
prohibited from making more than one revert on a single page – whether involving the same or different material – within a 24-hour period.
An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions, whether in whole or in part, counts as a revert.

You have been sanctioned for repeatedly turning biographies of living people into battlegrounds by edit warring after multiple blocks for the same behavior.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Beccaynr (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. Your recent edit to Hutt International Boys' School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you make this revert?

[1]? I need an answer. Doug Weller talk 21:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no answer to give you. ChurCuz (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's a shame as it's a violation of the CT alert above. I can see no reason not to topic ban you from the area, or at the very least give you a nice long block. I'll think about my choice for a while. Doug Weller talk 08:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A block for a revert of a talk page? You’re kidding me right? I only wanted to read it. I don’t see how this is a violation in anyway of Contentious topics I haven’t once edited about the conflict in Palestine if you’d have bothered to check my revision history. If you wanna block me for that then I am GONE from here never to return if that’s the kind of thing that would get a user blocked. ChurCuz (talk) 12:02, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You couldn't be bothered to tell me when I asked? And you had no right to revert, but you could have read it by looking at at the history and viewing the unreverted page. I'll give you a pass this time as it looks like you may not understand that simple thing. Just be more careful in the future. Doug Weller talk 13:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood.ChurCuz (talk) 14:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are banned from interacting with Scientelensia. This is a one-way ban for now, with an informal but strong expectation that Scientelensia refrains from interacting with you too. The ban does not automatically expire, but it can be undone by any uninvolved administrator after a year (Wikipedia:Contentious topics § Duration of restrictions), and I'd be fine with you requesting this and anyone doing so without asking me before.

You have been sanctioned because you have taken your pursuit of neutrality to a point where, under sanction for repeatedly turning biographies of living people into battlegrounds by edit warring after multiple blocks for the same behavior, you have turned yet another biography of a living person into a battleground ([2], [3], [4]), and because the person whose edits you've been fighting is the same one as last year.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Was talking on Scientelensia’s talk page just now I’ll now disengage. I accept this. ChurCuz (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look but no worries; you clearly hadn't seen this yet. I might revert your edits though, not as ban violation but as unproductive. I'll have to see what you wrote. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(done, collapsed. Thanks for pointing it out and for your understanding. And do feel free to remove these notices unless you'd like to keep them as a reminder to yourself. None of this is meant to be a wall of shame.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ChurCuz, the ban includes reverting edits made by Scientelensia, or responding to them, such as done at Darwin Núñez. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll revert them ChurCuz (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(I forgot to add diffs, diff 1, diff 2)

No need, I already did so, but thanks for being willing to undo them yourself. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind noticed you’ve done so. Should I just completely never edit that article again since I’d imagine Scientelensia will return to that article after their block? ChurCuz (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's probably best to stay away from Darwin Núñez and similar articles. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right. No problem ChurCuz (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Trouted for a warning template for the wrong person. That happens to everyone Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 22:19, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A badge of honour. ChurCuz (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]