Jump to content

User talk:Caroline Sanford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

De Beers : Thanks from 69.178.9.30

[edit]

I appreciate your feedback. My friends call me Peter.

Userpage : Light rain of tiny yellow flowers

[edit]

Stories in the Magic realism genre are almost always apocryphal. Check your source. :) Joestella 01:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Noah's Ark : Skeptical objections

[edit]

You are right - truly the article rambles and is disjointed, and I like the title of the section: "The Flood as Purported History" as a home for a lot of the gabby stuff about objections and replies.

Now for some good dialogues, see Plato, or George Bernard Shaw's Man and Superman - these guys knew how to make philosophical questions glow with dialogue I would not call "concocted."

I am frightened by that number 59% you give, but I believe it. I read someplace that 40% or more of Americans believe we never landed on the Moon. And then G.W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld seemingly paid a large sum of money to Mr. Rocco Martino, a discredited Italian businessman and former purveyor of so-called "spy data" to the French and to the Italian intelligence service (SISMI), as recompense for providing fake documents saying that Iraq had bought yellowcake Uranium from Niger.

"Oh when will they ever learn."

Thanks Carrionluggage 19:07, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you might fix up Noah's Ark soon? I think you can do it with less friction than occurs when I do it. Thanks Carrionluggage 17:28, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage and Munich : A drive-by compliment

[edit]

Great quote on your user page. :) tregoweth 19:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'll add to that. I saw your involvement on the talk page of Munich, and am pleased to see someone as cool-headed on such a tumultuous page. Edward Grefenstette 11:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References and archives

[edit]

Archives: 1.

Possibly unfree File:Womens Weekly Tux cover.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Womens Weekly Tux cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 19:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunflowers 150px.png listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sunflowers 150px.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Join the group at the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Caroline Sanford, you are invited to join the friendly hosts and others in the Teahouse. It is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! DocTree (talk) 21:24, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Caroline Sanford. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 17:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sarah (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Bandler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of specific crimes in Sydney, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hell's Angels and Comancheros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Caroline Sanford. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Apple Inc.

[edit]

Hello Caroline Sanford,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.

RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]