User talk:Browndog91

Welcome!

Hello, Browndog91, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of WWE United States Champions, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Richard BB 08:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to OVW Television Championship may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

OVW Southern Tag Team Championship

You are doing templates wrong. Please see the article for the changes I made. Bgwhite (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited OVW Southern Tag Team Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alex Silva and Sam Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of ROH World Tag Team Champions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eddie Edwards, Shingo and Kenny King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

OVW Womens Championship History: November 1st 2014 - Today

Apologies in advance if I have address this wrong, however I am not familiar with the Wiki set-up and needed to find someway in which to contact you regard errors that I see regarding the OVW Womens Championship History page.

(I was the recent user editing the OVW Womens Championship history, just under another name)

I am not doing this out of negativity or anything, I am merely editing facts that have been presented to the world via the OVW website as it shows on the championship history sections that the championship was vacated from then champion, Lei'D Tapa on November 1, 2014 and has since yet to been won by a new woman, since the womens division at the time was discontinued. There is talk of it being brought back up however as proven by a rare womens match a few weeks ago on OVW Television.

Hopefully I have cleared up this fact with you, and my honest apologies for seeming rude in anyway, I just want the page that I have edited to proved up-to-date information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RhawkOnline (talk • contribs) 03:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Triple crown

Hi. Ranze started a discussion in the project talk page. The agreement was to delete the potential champions section. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited RPW British Cruiserweight Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Preston City Wrestling Tag Team Championship for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Preston City Wrestling Tag Team Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston City Wrestling Tag Team Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444^Talk 08:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGW Undisputed Championship (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NGW Undisputed Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Browndog91, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGW Undisputed Championship (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NGW Undisputed Championship and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O (talk) 18:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Edits

What's the deal with you undoing my edits and then making the very same edit instantly afterwards? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 10:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC) When doing a title defense edit its good practice to put who the champion defeated in the edit summary so there are no arguments as to how many defenses someone has because people have put in the same defense twice thinking it hasn't been put in so the tally is more than it should be. Browndog91 10:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Browndog91. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:NGW Undisputed Championship

Hello, Browndog91. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "NGW Undisputed Championship".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 08:21, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Putting people up in championship articles

So you tell me to not put people up when the days are the same, but why everybody's doing the same thing in every other championship article? 176.36.57.234 (talk) 00:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

because its my way of doing things OVW pages are my main editing focuses so I like to edit them the way I want.

You don't edit the way you see fit. You edit based on the how it's supposed to be done. You don't own the article. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 06:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Instead of Reverting

Instead of reverting, fix the issue. That is also an option. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 06:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Format References

Please take the time to format references. If you are going to make the effort to edit the article, make the effort to format the reference. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Browndog91. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Diva Dirt - Is It Reliable?

There is a discussion currently ongoing in which we are trying to reach a consensus if Diva Dirt is reliable. You can view the discussion here. There has only been a couple of people who have responded. We need a wider input from more people. You're response is needed and appreciated. Thanks. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 21:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thank you and nice job on the ROH Grand Slam chart.

I'm horrible at doing stuff like that, so sometimes it's best just to tag out and let someone who knows what they're doing take over.

Vjmlhds (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your revert

Hello Browndog91, can you please explain your revert here? I suspect that ovwmania.blogspot.com is not an official blog of the Ohio Valley Wrestling. Thank you GSS (talk|c|em) 10:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

OVW recognizes OVWmania as its official results site and since it is the only site for OVW results their is no alternative for references.

Can you please provide a source to support your claim that It has been endorsed by OVW in the past and it is the only site that gives OVW results just trust me on this one. as I can't see anything about this blog on their offcial website so far. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:33, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

No source needed you just got to go with the flow don't take everything so seriously OVWmania gives results it doesn't have to be officially recognized it does the job of giving results that is good enough for me. Just trust me that it is I know it is but can't find a source.

Anyways I just asked for it at WP:PW/Sources. You can view the discussion here. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

It is on you, Browndog, to prove that it is the official results archive for OVW. You need to read Wikipedia:Blogs as sources and be careful when privately published blogs are used as sources. Until such time you can prove it is the official results archive, they are going to be removed. If you revert, disciplinary action could be taken. Don't get into a revert war. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 18:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Name one other site that gives OVW results? You want me to start using cagematch instead? There is no alternative for results if you remove all of references the articles look bare. talk

Browndog91 I don't understand if no one care to write about those results why we do? and if there is no alternative for results how this author gets all the information? this simply looks like a case of original research and WP:BURDEN which says Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source, so you either have to prove the reliability of this blog (ovwmania.blogspot.com) or remove all those links. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:30, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

So I have messaged them directly on Facebook and they have said this "Unofficial since it's a fan made blog but considering he has covered it so long it might as well be the "official" source" to me that says that OVW recognizes OVWmania in some way so I don't think we can exclusively say that it isn't official because there is some form of awareness there.

This is again WP:OR and as per your comment above they have said this Unofficial since it's a fan made blog I'm removing this soruce from all OVW related articles per WP:LINKSTOAVOID so please do not reinstate. Thank you GSS (talk|c|em) 06:30, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

they went on to say that they are considering making it official so for now here is what should happen, we put in ovwmania as a reference but then delete directly after that way if it later becomes official it is easier to put all the references back in, plus you missed the bit where they said it might as well be the official site. I think you are trying to get rid of the links instead of trying to make the links more credible which is the wrong way to go about things, it shouldn't be up to me to prove that something is credible it should be up to every editor to try and get more credible sites to put on Wikipedia.

You must read what Wikipedia is not especially WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. There is no need to keep those links we can add in the future when/if it become official. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Yeah but you still are avoiding the real problem which is going against me rather than working with me. At no point have you said anything like "I would like this to be a reference let me help you make it credible" or anything like that and I have always been the glass half full person who will look at things and try to make them better rather than shut down every idea good or bad.

Don't start the "poor-poor me" crap. It's on you to prove it is the official results archive. It's not on us to help you make it credible. The only way it will be used is if you can prove what you have not proved yet. If won't do it, than it's done and over with. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:39, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Sign Your Talk Page

You need to sign your comments even on your own talk page. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 05:39, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

I tried and it wasn't working for me. Browndog91

You obviously weren't trying. All you do is use four tildes (~~~~). Saying it doesn't work is an excuse to not sign your comments. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 03:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

ALLCAPS

Please, read WP:ALLCAPS. That's why some names, like KENTA, WALTER or TAJIRI are written Kenta, Walter and Tajiri (stylized in capital letters) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Format References

It's great you are adding references. Make sure you format them. If you don't know how to format a reference, go to WP:REF and find the appropriate template, click on it and use the appropriate parameters. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 14:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Browndog91. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Revolution Pro Wrestling. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! StaticVapor message me! 14:28, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

CZW

Hello. Are you sure? I mean, I don't follow CZW, but in their official website, those title changes happened and they recognized them. [1] Any case, I think the reigns should be added as official or unofficial, since the title changes happened. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:47, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes I messaged the official facebook page and that is what they told me also their is a results site that mentions it but if you want to mess around with how it is now go for it all I know is what they told me which Joeys reign nevers happens and MJF is a 1 time champ. Browndog91 12:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[[Browndog91}}Browndog91 12:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

I think it should be changed. The oficial website includes both title changes. The "undefeated" thing is storyline, not real. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

In fact, this is very strange. I checked other sources. CZW says Janela is a 4 times, champion, MJF is a 2 times champion and Lio Rush is a 2 times champion. Solies says Janela is a 3 times champ, MJF is a 2 times and Lio Rush is a 1 time champs (Solies doesn't include the title change between Janela and Rush). Also, Solies includes Rey Fenix as former champion. Wrestlig Titles says Janela is a 3 times, MJF is a 2 times and Rush is 1 time. So, any idea? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

I literally have zero idea where to begin the title history is so unclear that I don't think we will get a consensus on it but as far as the storyline aspect of it, if we look at the WWE title history we have Ted Dibiase in the article as an unofficial champion so I would think the same sort of thing would apply here although how to present it is another issue. I will look into the Fenix match and get back to you. 04:36, 22 May 2019 (UTC)Browndog91

Here are the results for the event Solies has Rey Fenix winning the CZW wired title at http://www.pwponderings.com/2017/08/05/pro-wrestling-revolver-rockstar-pro-080417-catalina-wrestling-mixer-results/ Browndog91 04:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I opened a discussion in the project talk page. maybe somebody'll help us. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Signature

Hi, sorry to bother you, but I saw your signature on posts isn't in keeping with the signature guidelines. You need to have a link for your talk page, and preferably your user page. If you need help changing this, please see WP:SIG. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

ROH title defenses

ROH does keep track of title defenses, they just don't have a public section on their website like WWE does. DCF94 (talk) 08:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

See discussion at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling#Matt_Taven_ROH_title_defenses Browndog91 (talk) 23:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

I know

Browwn dooog Abhishek Gandha (talk) 14:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)