Jump to content

User talk:BretDvr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (April 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 23:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I submitted this article (Draft:PolyAI) about two months ago, and it was rejected because I did not have enough notable sources. I've received a couple of additional sources that I would like to know whether they would rise to the level of notability and allow my article to be published. I could add more information from the articles to the pages, if necessary, but would like to make sure they are valid before resubmitting.
https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/archive/Article?StrId=7008288 (From Taiwan, translated version here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAdnoed5WI2PuvDDnP-NEU32a1VI_iqK/view?usp=drive_link)
https://startups.co.uk/startups-100/2023/polyai/
Thanks. BretDvr (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, BretDvr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 23:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PolyAI - Additional Sources - Establishing Notability?

[edit]

I submitted this article (Draft:PolyAI) about two months ago, and it was rejected because I did not have enough notable sources. I've received a couple of additional sources that I would like to know whether they would rise to the level of notability and allow my article to be published. I could add more information from the articles to the pages, if necessary, but would like to make sure they are valid before resubmitting.

https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/archive/Article?StrId=7008288 (From Taiwan, translated version here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAdnoed5WI2PuvDDnP-NEU32a1VI_iqK/view?usp=drive_link)

https://startups.co.uk/startups-100/2023/polyai/

Thanks. BretDvr (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (August 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Encoded  Talk 💬 22:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (August 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sohom (talk) 04:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]