User talk:Brandonkellynd

February 2017

Hello, I'm Qaei. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Online platforms for collaborative consumption have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qaei ☎ 15:03, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brandonkellynd, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Brandonkellynd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Collaborative consumption. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Collaborative consumption was changed by Brandonkellynd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963397 on 2017-02-17T01:14:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significant major sourcing overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Brandonkellynd/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 01:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Qi (standard), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Qi (standard) was changed by Brandonkellynd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861477 on 2017-02-17T02:33:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Dash (cryptocurrency). It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Alexf^(talk) 17:43, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am seconding that. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion (see WP:PROMO which is policy). If you continue to abuse your editing privileges to add self-promotional (or promotional of other people, companies, or products) content and links, you will find your editing privileges restricted or taken away. Please stop. Jytdog (talk) 18:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Brandonkellynd/sandbox

Hello, Brandonkellynd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 14:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]