User talk:BlauweVis

Welcome!

Hello, BlauweVis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bluefish (software) (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bluefish (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– DreamRimmer (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DreamRimmer,

the Bluefish wikipedia page was created almost 20 years ago. It is translated in 21 languages. Of those 21, the english article is the best and most comprehensive. Only recently it came to my attention it was soft deleted because it did did not meet the quality standards.

I've looked at many other editors from the http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/List_of_text_editors and the http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/List_of_HTML_editors to get a feel for the required quality standards. In my humble opinion the Bluefish article is perhaps not the best, but is at least part of the best 50% of the editor articles (if not the top 25%). Why are those editors listed - many of them commercial instead of open source, many of them not so bound to the history of the Linux desktop? And why is the Bluefish article soft deleted and after my improvement attempts still not good enough? I can accept that it is not good enough, but it is hard to accept if all those other editor articles are below the quality.

Can you please help with suggestions how to improve? Or maybe compare the quality to the other listed editors and see if it meets the quality standard that is commonly accepted for editors?

I hope you can help me with this. It feels very frustrating.

Kind regards BlauweVis (talk) 16:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BlauweVis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bluefish (software) (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bluefish (software) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:37, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SafariScribe,

after the previous review by DreamRimmer I got some help and started using the list of reliable sources provided by the Free and open-source software task force. A large number of references is now from this list.

(see http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Software/Free_and_open-source_software_task_force/List_of_reliable_sources), so I'm a bit confused why the sources are not considered reliable?

I furthermore compared the quality of the article to comparable editors (as in lightweight general purpose code editors) in List_of_HTML_editors and List_of_text_editors. In my humble opinion the quality is better than Arachnophilia, Coda_(web_development_software), BBEdit, SciTE, Sublime_Text, UltraEdit, Geany, Gedit. The quality is on par with Atom_(text_editor), Kate_(text_editor). The only editor article that is really a lot better is Notepad++. That's why I decided to resubmit. I'm a bit lost now, since I followed all guidelines from the Free and Open Source software task force since the previous submission. Are there any specific references that cause this problem? BlauweVis (talk) 11:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bluefish (software) has been accepted

Bluefish (software), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sohom (talk) 10:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]