User talk:Apksza

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Droid are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 18:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of attacks related to secondary schools

The References section is a vital part of any Wikipedia article, please never remove it. If an article is too long, consider how it might be split instead. Leschnei (talk) 18:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Daraban Tehsil, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 13:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Winston Churchill ‎, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Your edit included at least one misplaced external link. If you intended them to be references, please read Referencing for beginners. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Apksza! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Apksza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Apksza, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 13:39, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editing problems

Every one of the edits you have made so far has been reverted or deleted. That ought to tell you that there is some problem, apart from the messages above. Your editing has contained various problems, including posting advertising material, adding text to articles which has no apparent relevance to the content of those articles, and removing article content without explanation. As for your editing of the article List of video games in development, I can only hope that it was some kind of mistake. If you are to continue to edit Wikipedia, you need to slow down, and take note of messages from editors expressing concerns about your editing. My recommendation is to start by making minor improvements to material already in articles, and not add any significant new material until you have more experience. Please do take notice of this advice, because if you carry on in the way you have been doing, before long you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Apksza (talk) 17:57, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you say "Thanks", but since I posted my message above you have twice yet again posted promotional links to the same web site as before, and about which you had already been warned. Consider yourself lucky that you haven't already been blocked from editing, and expect to be blocked without further notice if you continue in the same way. JBW (talk) 12:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because almost all of your editing has consisted of attempts to use Wikipedia to publicise your web site, and the few other edits you have made have mostly if not all been unconstructive in other ways. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter.JBW (talk) 19:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC).[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.