User talk:MrOllie
If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
About Consanguine marriage
[edit]“Second-degree cousins or closer” is confused, does it include first-cousin-twice-removed? Or first-cousin-thrice-removed? Or half-second-cousin? And in a clinical sense, the coefficient of relationship (r) should be used to consider where a marriage is consanguine marriage or not, i.e. a marriage is consanguine marriage when the coefficient of relationship (r) is a number or higher, and this number should be 3.125% since it is the coefficient of relationship (r) of second cousin. 118.170.12.249 (talk) 12:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- No. You are adding WP:OR and nonsense to that article, over and over again. That is disruption. Just stop, and just stop posting on my user talk about it. MrOllie (talk) 12:45, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- So does “second-degree cousins or closer” include first-cousin-twice-removed? Or first-cousin-thrice-removed? Or half-second-cousin? Or double-second-cousin-once-removed? 114.38.72.194 (talk) 05:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- I repeat: Stop posting here. MrOllie (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- So does “second-degree cousins or closer” include first-cousin-twice-removed? Or first-cousin-thrice-removed? Or half-second-cousin? Or double-second-cousin-once-removed? 114.38.72.194 (talk) 05:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
About improve the Kaspersky edits that you remove
[edit]Hello Mr. Ollie, you canceled a number of my edits in Kaspersky product pages and on the company page itself as “promo”. I have re-read the overrides more than once and agree that the description of business products on the company page can indeed look a bit promotional unfortunately. I didn't have such a goal, just while I was looking into the topic of corporate information security I saw that the company has a lot of relevant products, but wikipedia doesn't have them, so I decided to add it. How to do it more correctly? Name and description of the main functions only more briefly than I had? Or is it about the source of information and need their descriptions not from the site of the company itself?
Similar question about the description of program versions. Is the problem that the source is the company's site or that there are too many details about the functions?
And the third question about the section with independent testing. I think it is important to specify that the quality of products is confirmed by independent tests. But I would like to do it correctly, not to promote the company, but just to point out the fact. Should I remove information about the evaluations themselves and the number of awards? Should we leave only the fact of positive evaluations by the relevant research centers?
I hope for your answer on these questions. Thank you. Buuzbashi (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Per WP:NOT, a product listing is not necessary, Rather than trying to figure out how to include it, I would suggest reconsidering your assumption that it should be included at all. Test results (like anything else in a Wikipedia article) should be driven by secondary sources, not by citations directly to the organizations making the tests. MrOllie (talk) 21:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick reply and for the link to the appropriate rule. 21:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC) Buuzbashi (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
It was an unpleasant experience, interacting with you
[edit]I must say that the interaction with you was by far the most unpleasant experience I have had in Wikipedia for years. You have deleted---in a very rude way---the absolutely correct information about Mistral AI chatbot used by zillions of people around the world because you personally decided that it was not important for the readers of Wikipedia. Looking at your "contribution" list it seems that this is actually what you do -- you delete things. Is it the power to delete that drives you? What a miserable life you must have. Anyway, I hope I will never interact with you again, Sincerely, Dmt137 (talk) 11:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- You added completely unsourced material about a nonnotable chatbot, in plain violation of both Wikipedia's content policies and the inclusion criteria for that list. You should expect other people to resist when you blatantly ignore site policies. MrOllie (talk) 12:27, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
What are the requirements for being a "notable chatbot"?
[edit]Hi, I would like to know which are the requirement to be a notable chatbot, thank you, Sam
(p.s. the project Cheshire Cat AI has 2.6K stars on GitHub) Sambarza (talk) 23:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's a list of chatbots with preexisting Wikipedia articles. Social media likes (such as GitHub stars) are easily gamed and mean precisely nothing. MrOllie (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- clear thanks Sambarza (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
trailer (vehicle) sub-category tagged as "product placement"
[edit]Greetings, I'm still fairly knew to the whole wiki editor role and was curious what tipped off my writing as "product placement". Are there any changes I can make to the piece I wrote to make it be within compliance? Thank you for your time
Cornbredphilospher (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Cornbredphilospher (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Cornbredphilospher (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- It was a completely unsourced section with a adverty image. I suggest you don't add it at all - we do not need a list of various types of things that might be found on top of a trailer. Every other trailer type of that sort on the page is anchored by a link to another Wikipedia article. MrOllie (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ugh.... and now I'm back to square one. I was told by user 331dot to post it in the trailer section as a subcategory. My original article has taken down for not having enough high quality sources. But no such source exists. There are PLENTY of corporations and other for profit companies that have articles or blog posts detailing what a cable reel trailer is... but nothing from the academia world. I feel stuck and frustrated. That's not your problem, just venting. Cornbredphilospher (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- If no source exists, per WP:V policy requires that we leave it out, I'm afraid. MrOllie (talk) 20:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- The WP:V policy page was helpful. Thank you. Cornbredphilospher (talk) 20:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- If no source exists, per WP:V policy requires that we leave it out, I'm afraid. MrOllie (talk) 20:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ugh.... and now I'm back to square one. I was told by user 331dot to post it in the trailer section as a subcategory. My original article has taken down for not having enough high quality sources. But no such source exists. There are PLENTY of corporations and other for profit companies that have articles or blog posts detailing what a cable reel trailer is... but nothing from the academia world. I feel stuck and frustrated. That's not your problem, just venting. Cornbredphilospher (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)