User talk:Anshuk
![]() |
It is approximately 10:16 PM where this user lives (India). [ ] |
If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it. Please leave responses on your talk page. Thanks. |
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Kukini 06:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Who will welcome me Vidhan Labana (talk) 07:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Bollywood Film list criteria
[edit]Anshuk currently we are looking at lists from reputed online sites ( upperstall) which are mentioned on the article page, if you know of other online resources please do let us know. Voting could be a problem as we do not have a huge base of knowledgable people and hence the list can get biased due to low particpation. Haphar 14:05, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I can solve I have polls in my android to find number of votes . Vidhan Labana (talk) 07:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Atif Aslam
[edit]Thanks for your support. The article was deleted as it was deemed to have violated a copyright. I am taking care to avoid copy pasting the old article from different sources. --Doc sameer 21:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I think u hv a problem deleting every copyright. Vidhan Labana (talk) 07:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
user talk pages
[edit]Actually, it is permissible to remove warnings etc. from your own user talk page (see WP:UP#CMT). Don't mean to contradict you or anything, but I don't like to see nice people get into pointless revert wars when they'll lose anyway. --carelesshx talk 07:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Got it. Thanks. Anshuk 07:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Economy of Erie, PA
[edit]The links you removed provided useful additional information on the Erie economy. Maybe the wording looked like an advertisement, but the links highlight state development programs in Pennsylvania. You might have relocated the links to the External links section at the bottom instead of deleting them. I placed the links in context for ease of use. --Pat (talk) 10:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Lets have this discussion on the article talk page. Thanks. Anshuk (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
[edit]Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anshuk! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 15:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Block declined
[edit]Hello. Just wanted to let you know that I declined to block 97.87.82.66 (talk · contribs) because they do not appear to have vandalized any after their final warning: 14:31 12 December 2007 - your warning, 13:51, 12 December 2007 - their last edit. --Kralizec! (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Time
[edit]May I get time to give some information to article? Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Halogeentje (talk • contribs) 08:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Re: Mithya
[edit]Hi there! Well, I did have a look at the article before because I knew of its critical acclaim. Unfortunately, I don't improve movie articles significantly unless I've seen the film. I hope that I shall find an occasion to watch it add content to it. Thanks for your message and sorry that I cannot immediately work on it. Cheers! Mspraveen (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Manik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Anshuk (talk) 23:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
台灣
[edit]Why 台灣 just be able. There as only same condition.RushdimIDlike (talk) 10:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Lichfield Rugby Union Football Club
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Lichfield Rugby Union Football Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Anshuk (talk) 10:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- response
Have added sufficient information and sourced Jrgilly (talk) 11:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Re dirty po
[edit]Summick like ``high school musical`` can be got rid of quickly with {{db-redirtypo}}. If you are feeling kind you can tell the original author in case they have not the sense to look at their own contributions. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks --Anshuk (talk) 06:55, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Deletion HELLO TO YOU ~Hello! Project 10 Shuunen Kinen Theme~ and Cover You
[edit]I understand about the deletion of HELLO TO YOU ~Hello! Project 10 Shuunen Kinen Theme~ since its just a song on the album and not many people will care about information or not but I'm not sure why Cover You should be deleted, since the release of the album is coming up soon. hippoharry07 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC).
- I advice you to voice your opinion on the article deletion pages. I have given my reasons there. After you have gone through them, I will be more than happy to answer your questions.--Anshuk (talk) 07:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
List of Rachael Ray guests
[edit]I appreciate your tact. Firstly, I am a list person. I make lists. You know how many pages I have been through on the site to get all those on the list? So far I have been through 80 pages. I do appreciate that you have noticed I put a lot of work into it.
But anyways, it is a good resource to see who has been on the show. I have been thinking making a list for the Ellen Show like this one. Mr. C.C. (talk) 09:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Merge and delete. Mergers are followed by redirects and deletion process are not involved in mergers. If you want to suggest a merge, you should go to WP:MRFD. - Mgm|(talk) 22:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
journals
[edit]All primary peer-research journals published by the BMJ are highly likely to be notable. It's just a matter of putting in the information. If you do not want to do it yourself, put in an "expand" tag and the Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals will soon get to them. DGG (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Regarding Bheja Fry
[edit]Hi Anshuk, I am new to wikipedia and not very good at editing... There is a 2007 film by name "Bheja fry", and Bheja fry is also a non-vegetarian dish of fried brains... I was trying to create a disambiguation page for "Bheja fry", and I did manage, but there is a redirect Bheja fry page, and I dont know how to fix this issue. Can you please look into it if you're an old user and good at editing... Thanks. Lilaac (talk) 19:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Hemchandra Kanungo
[edit]Dear Anshuk,
I have given my reply to the issue of Speedy deletion on the Hemchandra Kanungo. I believe that reply will be evaluated on the basis of the contents.
I must repeat that A7 does not apply. Secondly, Hemchandra Kanungo is a historic personality, an Indian revolutionary associated with Ghosh brothers.
Thanks
Sumir Sharma —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumir Sharma (talk • contribs) 03:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Infosys-logo.gif
[edit]File:Infosys-logo.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Infosys-logo.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Infosys-logo.gif]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Questions about a certain page
[edit]Hi I'm trying to figure out what the Wasif Ali Wasif page is all about please discuss it on the articles Talk Page
andyzweb (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Barkha Dutt Edit
[edit]Hi. Thanks for your note. I agree with your changes. I have nothing against any person. I just thought it was an interesting link. Warm Regards Wikipedian
Patrollbot
[edit]Hey there, I thought (because of your participation in the conversation here) that you would like to know that I coded a bot to mark CSDed AFDed and PRODed new-pages as patrolled. See the bot's discussion for approval here. I would appreciate your comment. NOTE: I am not trying to canvas you, I just wanted some input. Tim1357 (talk) 02:16, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Anshuk! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 735 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Atif Aslam - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Foreign-language contributions
[edit]Hi. {{db-foreign}} is only used in the situation (not common in my experience) where an article from a foreign WP has been cut-and-pasted here (the point being that to do that loses the contribution record - there is a procedure at WP:TRANSLATE for doing it properly). The foreign WP reference should be included in the tag, e.g. {{db-foreign|source=es:Warekena}}.
Much more usually, what we get is a foreign text input by somebody who probably doesn't know any other WP exists. The right tag then is {{notenglish}}, which is not a speedy request - because sometimes these articles are worth translating. When that expands on the article page, it gives you a message and a link to the place to paste it on WP:PNT, where someone who knows the language may pick it up and translate or PROD or whatever is appropriate.
If you know or can guess the language, then put, e.g., {{notenglish|Spanish}}. That gives a more useful template, including a link to the relevant foreign Wikipedia, and also a link to Google Translate, which will show you a machine translation - rough and ready, but often good enough to tell you that the article is about a NN band or person and can be speedy tagged without bothering to list it at PNT.
The Google Translate facility can be used to help guess the language - e.g. if it looks like Arabic but the translation makes no sense, try Farsi.
There is a useful set of message templates such as {{contrib-ru1}} to give the author a bilingual message saying we require English and pointing him to the foreign WP. List of them at WP:PNT/T. The most exotic one I have yet used for real is {{contrib-sq1}}.
Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:58, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Yaya Da Costa in Glamour
[edit]http://all-antm.net/thumbnails.php?album=298&page=9 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.84.98.77 (talk) 20:45, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thanks!
[edit]Hey. Thanks for the barnstar! I just thought I'd clear up however that the errors on the page weren't anything to do with your edits. They were caused by an earlier edit by another user.
Anyway, I've never had a proper barnstar before so I was very pleased to receive this. And thanks for contributing to the article.
cya Coolug (talk) 19:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Source removed as I couldn't even find an apt 'about us', besides the website you added doesn't ring a bell in my mind. It isn't a community recognized web name. We are continuously experiencing IP vandalism on this article, and I have also initiated a semi protection, I'll add an appropriate citation if required, thanks for your contributions.Fanofbollywood (talk) 07:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, a user has been trying to cite their article which is dubious on the Delhi Belly page. Check citation #10. I have been trying to post a link to the actual interview and a user has been pasting a link to their own article, which has no credibility compared to the link with the actual interview. How is posting a better source/link considered spam? It's spam if you constantly try to post a link with no credibility. On top of this, this user has posted a nasty comment on my page. Shameful. --MajorBollywoodFan (talk) 19:01, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Lets talk more about this here --Anshuk (talk) 20:04, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Anshuk, I created a section called 'Design' (similar to the wiki page of 'The Dark Knight'). I also posted a citation. My site is the first to publish this information. Let me know your thoughts. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.16.12 (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- Introducing the Design section is a novel idea for Bollywood movies. Keep it up. But I don't think a rojakhan.com external link can be allowed on wikipedia. You own this site and this act amounts to advertising and an obvious conflict of interest. I hope you understand why we can't allow all the site owners to start advertising on wikipedia. You can surely replace it with the TOI link as present in the rojakhan article. Your additions to wikipedia are realy helping the community. Also I spent some time on your site and it seems above average. Keep up the good work on both ends. --Anshuk (talk) 06:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
First off, thank you. RojaKhan is new and we already have quite a number of unique visitors who return several times daily. Second, I get the point now about wiki citations. So I'll change the link and put the TOI link instead. Take care. --MajorBollywoodFan (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Anshuk, I just re-checked the TOI link (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Hrithiks-Agneepath-postponed/articleshow/9111692.cms). It talks about why the movie has been postponed to 2012 (which by the way also has to be changed on Agneepath's wiki page). However, TOI does not go into how the first look of Hrithik's character was revealed and so forth, which is what needs to be cited. I'll see if there is a prominent site that gives this particular information. --MajorBollywoodFan (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Done. MoneyControl.com had an article on it.
- Beautiful --Anshuk (talk) 01:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: edit summary
[edit]Maybe Template:User deletionist? πr2 (t • c) 15:36, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
--Thank You PiRSquared17. This works Anshuk (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e7/Wikipedia_Rollbacker.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Rollbacker.svg.png)
Hi Anshuk. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! INeverCry 21:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
EDITS ON DADA
[edit]Do you have any particular reason for deleting the information I posted? I carried on a research project on Dada and the claims of a Dada spirit are factual If you'd like, you can read all these sources and check
Cabanne, Pierre, and Marcel Duchamp. Dialogues with Marcel Duchamp. New York: Viking, 1971. Print.
Dawn Ades and Matthew Gale. "Dada." Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. Web. 3 Jun. 2013. <http://www.oxfordartonline.com/ subscriber/article/grove/art/T021094>.
Lippard, Lucy R. Dadas on Art,. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-‐Hall, 1971. Print. Harrison, Charles, and Paul Wood, eds. Art in Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993. Print.
Foster, Stephen C., and Rudolf E. Kuenzli. Dada Spectrum: The Dialectics of Revolt. Madison, Wi.: Coda, 1979. Print.
- My mistake. I apologize. I have undone my changes -- Anshuk (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FJAB26 (talk • contribs) 16:51, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Anshuk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Magic_Wand_Icon_229981_Color_Flipped.svg/220px-Magic_Wand_Icon_229981_Color_Flipped.svg.png)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Anshuk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Anshuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Anshuk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Please help with usability testing
[edit]Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform
For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)
Thank you,
NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)