User talk:Alvrix3104

February 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Queen's Gambit (miniseries), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 03:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Alvrix3104, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! CapnZapp (talk) 08:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Beth Harmon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Beth Harmon. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Beth Harmon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Beth Harmon. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beth Harmon has been accepted

Beth Harmon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, you don’t how does this mean for me. Alvrix3104 (talk) 04:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beth Harmon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beth Harmon, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Harmon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alvrix3104. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was a really dumb move, as you can see wikipedia takes sock puppetry very seriously and it will get you blocked instantly. Since you're a fairly new editor, and have made some productive contributions to wikipedia, they will probably show leniency and let you edit again if you tell them that you have read and understood WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, and that you promise never to use multiple accounts to deceive other editors again. Along with vandalism, it's one of the big no-nos on wikipedia. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind I see you did the same thing as User:Alvrix3108. My sympathy has disappeared. You knew exactly what you were doing and you knew the likely consequence. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 14:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alvrix3104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just wanted to make fair changes with the pages, but I didn't know that was allowed. Everything I wanted was to save my page from deletion, because I feel something important and I panicked when it was nominated for deletion. I'm sorry, just give me one chance and I promise that I will never do it again, wou have my word, this will never happen again. Alvrix3104 (talk) 13:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS

User has requested unblocking via UTRS appeal #40729. They have been referred to their talk page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alvrix3104, your best bet is to post here what you posted at UTRS. No guarantees, but it is a start. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alvrix3104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to request my chance to be unblocked. When I created my firsts page, I feel powerful and proud of making an article. When it was nominated to be deleted, I panicked because my I was afraid of losing the work that I created. I admit that I created 2 other accounts in a desperate attempt to save my page but I was caught. Now I have read everything about sock puppetry and now I understand that I something wrong. I abused of multiple accounts and betrayed Wikipedia trust and I'm sorry. Now I understand that the article that I created doesn’t have enough information to have an individual article, and you know what I won’t try to abuse multiple to save it. I understand if you don’t want to unlock me ver again, because I recognize that I abused your trust, but I made an article, and I contributed to Wikipedia. I'm new and I didn’t know that something you know as sock puppetry would exist, but when I see that I was under investigation I found out the existence of this. But you can’t deny that I made some productive contributions, I helped to expand Geralt of Rivia page, and created that Article. I also made corrections to some pages, between other things, and never created any edits wars. Now I have read everything about sock puppetry and now I understand why I can’t use multiple accounts, and I promise to never do something like this ever again. I was dumb and stupid, but If you unblock, I promise to continue making edits on Wikipedia to expand and make corrections about something, and I promise that sock puppetry will never happen again, but if you don’t and thinks this is not enough, then I understand that you don’t trust me anymore. I would be happy to be unblocked and to still contributing to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I suggest you follow the instructions in the standard offer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Number Five (The Umbrella Academy)

Hello, Alvrix3104. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Number Five (The Umbrella Academy), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Number Five (The Umbrella Academy)

Hello, Alvrix3104. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Number Five".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]