User talk:Ah1954

Help. I'm new here, & have no idea what I'm doing.

The article on Edmund Blampied mentions my grandfather, Thomas McKeggie as one of EB's early teachers. I'm trying to find the source of this information. Can anyone help? (possibly Ah1954 who, I suspect wrote the article)

If I'm using the wrong method to ask this question, please point me in the right direction.

tcmck

Tcmck 16:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems some of the images I have uploaded for a biography of the artist Edmund Blampied have been marked for deletion because they are OR and CV. They have been inserted within the entry so are not orphans. When I uploaded them I gave them a wrong licence, which I have since changed to FAL, Free Art Licence. This seems the most appropriate, but I may be wrong, so any guidance would be appreciated.

I have been given permission from the Estate of Edmund Blampied to use the images, and they have provided the photograph of the artist. I can provide a postal address if someone would like to check my permissions.

This is my first submission to Wikipedia and I would appreciate helpful support while I find my way around.

Ah1954

Mèrcie bein des fais pouor l'articl'ye sus Bliampid! The images may well be problematic, though. Unless the Blampied estate has had a change of heart recently, I'd be surprised if they really intended to permit distribution and commercial use under the Free Art license. Copyright works that are restricted to use on Wikipedia are currently deprecated and liable to deletion (see Template:Copyrighted). But if the permissions from the copyright owners are compatible with Wikipedia requirements, it might be an idea to quote the text of the permissions on the relevant image description pages. (BTW, IANAL!) Man vyi 18:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would the person who added the reference please add the date of publication and publisher, so that someone could obtain the document. If it is about Blampied, then it could me moved to the bibliography. Ah1954

Stubs

Hi - you seem to misunderstand how to mark articles as stubs. For some reason you are copying and pasting a section of Wikipedia:Stub relating to the creation of new stub templates, rather than actually adding a stub template to the article. To mark an article as a stub, simply add the relevant template from the list at WP:WSS/ST - for example {{Food-stub}} or {{Artist-stub}} (or, if this is too long a list to look through, simply add {{stub}}). Please don't copy and paste the "how to" example from WP:STUB, otherwise the stubs will be lost in a non-existent category called Category:B stubs (which is what happened with Salomon van Abbé and Ernest Stephen Lumsden!) Grutness...wha? 13:23, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nasrin Pervin Huq

Could you upload the image to wikimedia commons, so that we can use it on an article on her in the Bangla wikipedia (http://bn.wiki.x.io )? Also, do you speak Bangla? if you do, can you please start an article there as well? Thanks. --Ragib 21:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nasreen Huq

I will upload the photograph as you ask. Sorry I don't speak Bangla but someone is very welcome to translate the article. Regards --Ah1954

Edmund Blampied

Edit away! (And you still can't believe everything you read in the newspapers...) Man vyi 17:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanBot is on a bit of a rampage, ignoring fair use rationales all over the place, judging by reaction. I have removed the delete template, added a PD template to flag up your PD justification and laid out an exposition of what I understand to be your reasoning on the image talk page. Please amend as necessary if I have mis-stated your case. Man vyi 07:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You could, if that is your claim, use the PD-stamp template to place in Category:Public domain stamp images. I'd be dubious, personally, that the Blampied estate didn't claim copyright in the artwork, though. Man vyi 08:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EBOccupStamps1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EBOccupStamps1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 14:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Nicolson (artist)

You just created a page called "Create new entry". I have "moved" it, i.e. changed its title, to John Nicolson (artist), which seems the right title for it. It could do with some references. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Nicolson (artist)

I was wondering how to do that. There was an incorrect link from a page on Edmund Blampied to a cricketer named John Nicolson, so to solve the problem I have started work on an entry on the artist. I have added two references and will send the entry to the artist's daughter to get more information. --Ah1954 (talk) 11:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As long as the "target" title is not in use, you can rename a page by clicking the "move" tab at the top. Then the original page becomes a redirect pointing to the new one; if that's not appropriate, {{db-r3}} at the topof the original page asks for it to be deleted. More details at WP:MOVE. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Harpole & Foxberrow 96dpi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Harpole & Foxberrow 96dpi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NAHID 12:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Harpole & Foxberrow 96dpi.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Harpole & Foxberrow 96dpi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AtTheWingsEB.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:AtTheWingsEB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Month in the Country 96dpi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Month in the Country 96dpi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:EBOccupStamps1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EBOccupStamps1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fine Prints of the Year (monograph series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Benson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ah1954. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ah1954. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

London Magazine Editions moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, London Magazine Editions, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ah1954. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ah1954. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:London Magazine Editions

Hello, Ah1954. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "London Magazine Editions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ah1954. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 13:50, 2 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Ah1954! You created a thread called Link to external site gives 404 message at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Harrison (engraver), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wimbledon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meggie Albanesi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Bill of Divorcement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:EBOccupStamps1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EBOccupStamps1.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It is a scan of an envelope in my personal collection which I uploaded many years ago. I don't really understand what you are saying. The file is replaceable in the sense that there are lots of other examples of covers with these stamps on the internet, including my web site on Blampied, which has the approval of the Estate of Edmund Blampied, here:

https://www.threeisacollection.org/blampied/blampied_stamps.html

If there are some words I should use perhaps you can tell me what they are? I find this whole issue to be unclear and difficult to follow, so some examples would be helpful. But if you want to delete it if you feel that's justified, then please go ahead. Ah1954 (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Non-free files may only be used in Wikipedia articles under strict criteria called "WP:fair use". Non-free files may only be used in Wikipedia articles if they fulfill all of the WP:fair use criteria. The usage of this file fails the very first fair use criteria: Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Betty Trask aged 35 in 1928.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Betty Trask aged 35 in 1928.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]