User talk:ACLWXH

Welcome!

Hello, ChesterLim15, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Smart Manager, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smart Manager

The article Smart Manager has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Havelock II for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Havelock II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Havelock II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. South Nashua (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Art Friend

Hello ChesterLim15,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Art Friend for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Lineslarge (talk) 08:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Survivalcraft) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Survivalcraft, ChesterLim15!

Wikipedia editor Lee Vilenski just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add more secondary sources for this article. Please check Metacritic, as a few reliable sources have reviewed the game. Also, try to organize articles in the same style as other video games. Instead of "bried Introduction", try "Overview", the history section is also just patch notes, whereas on Wikipedia we look for development sections.
I'd also suggest changing "Today, Survivalcraft", to saying that the game was later available on Android et al. Wikipedia isn't in present tense.
Also, Welcome to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Lee Vilenski's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 11:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOTUS-Simulator moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, LOTUS-Simulator, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 22:49, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:LOTUS-Simulator concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:LOTUS-Simulator, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LOTUS-Simulator

Hello, ACLWXH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LOTUS-Simulator".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:18, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]