User talk:23x2

Nicosia

Hello 23x2 and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry to have to inform you that edits such as this constitute disruptive editing. You seem to be pushing your point of view in violation of different Wikipedia's policies, namely WP:NPOV and WP:V.

Wikipedia is not a soapbox and it should never be used to promote your personal beliefs. Please stop. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:39, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Akritas Plan

Please do not revert edits without any explanation into an unreferenced claim. First start a discussion in the talk page of the article if you need help. TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Darklordseth, you just reverted to an unreferenced sentence and at the same time you left me a message saying i sould not do that?

Cypriot Annan Plan referendums, 2004

Could you explain why you believe putting the causes of the outcome and having the results in the introduction are "pov"? Number 5 7 11:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting, and explain why you think the text below is not NPOV

A referendum on the Annan Plan was held in the Republic of Cyprus and the breakaway Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus on 24 April 2004. The two communities were asked whether they approved of the fifth revision of the United Nations proposal for reuniting the island, which had been divided since 1974. Whilst it was approved by 65% of Turkish Cypriots, it was rejected by 76% of Greek Cypriots. Turnout for the referendum was high at 89% amongst Greek Cypriots and 87% amongst Turkish Cypriots, which was taken as indicative of great interest in the issue on the part of the electorates.

Failure to respond or another revert will result in a block. Number 5 7 14:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AE report filed by User:Grandmaster

User:Grandmaster has filed an AE report on Nagorno-Karabakh trying to limit participation in the article. Take a look as users active on the article’s talk pages. http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Nagorno-Karabakh_article Dehr (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 23x2 (talk) 18:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restricting access to users in Armenia-Azerbaijan

I would like to pick the brain of more experienced users about the ongoing exchange between [User:Grandmaster] and a couple of administrators. Grandmaster suggests to restrict access to some and potentially to all articles in Armenia-Azerbaijan by excluding new users [1]. You can reply on my home page if you wish. Dehr (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. When you recently edited Greek genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Occupation of Smyrna

In this edit you hold that an occupation, taking place in 1919, was in keeping with the provisions of a treaty signed in 1920; that is rather weird and, furthermore, considering the material you removed, it appears to be POV-pushing. You may of course add that the Greeks held that the occupation was justified under the terms of the Armistice of Mudros, but you should not try to paint the occupation as if it was entirely uncontroversial, which it was not. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:58, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Salvio, thanks for your message duly noted, but i disagree with what you said the edit does. The article says "occupation" ended in 1922. However the provisions of the Treaty of Sèvres signed in 1920, state that Smyrna was to be administered by a local parliament in a Greek zone. When User E4024 removed from the article the statement reading "and the provisions of the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920" I saw that it was silencing the fact that there is a treaty under which this "occupation" was recognized by Turkey at least from 1920 onwards. I think to rectify this, we must amend the occupation "From" - "To" date. It should read something like this: "It was occupied in 1919, and in 1920 the occupation ended with the signing of a Treaty". What do you think? 23x2 _φ 18:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as an editor, I agree that the signing of the 1920 treaty should indeed be mentioned — I'm not sure whether it belongs in the lead, however, but this is a matter of editorial discretion —; that said, we really should be moving this discussion to the article's talk page... Cheers.

Salvio

^{Let's talk about it!} 20:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, cheers!23x2 _φ 20:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Treaty of Guarantee (1960)

In what way you claim is "unsourced pov", the Treaty of Guarantee stated the phrase "current state of affairs", which refers to Zürich and London Agreement. It not only guarantee independence of the island but also a confessional, consociational democracy. The Greek-Junta-backed coup threaten this consociational democracy.

How can u claim it is unsourced, it is right in the treaty and agreement, and how can u claim it is pov. I'm making npov according to these treaty and agreement. Pls talk to me before u undid anyhow.Tantingting (talk) 15:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, looking at your records and even this talk page, IT IS U who really indeed seemed to be pushing your agenda and POV, look at urself in the mirror before pointing finger at others. Tantingting (talk) 15:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Tantingting please see the talk of the related article. Thanks 23x2 _φ 22:12, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenicia / Greeks

I did not remove the Dalmatia, I have added the Greek colonies on the Adriatic! Please check it out! I added the colonies Croatian and Italian and I have not deleted anything!--Gepgepgep (talk) 18:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re Cyprus

You can put all this on the article talk page, I don't mind. --Golbez (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to First Council of Nicaea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'ni:kaɪja/) was a council of Christian bishops convened in [[Nicaea]] in [[Bithynia]] in [[Turkey]]) by the [[Roman Emperors|Roman Emperor]] [[Constantine I]] in [[AD]] 325. This first [[ecumenical
the summer of 325, the bishops of all provinces were summoned to [[Nicaea]], in modern-day Turkey), a place easily accessible to the majority of delegates, particularly those of [[Early centers of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to First Council of Nicaea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'ni:kaɪja/) was a council of Christian bishops convened in [[Nicaea]] in [[Bithynia]] in [[Turkey]]) by the [[Roman Emperors|Roman Emperor]] [[Constantine I]] in [[AD]] 325. This first [[ecumenical
the summer of 325, the bishops of all provinces were summoned to [[Nicaea]], in modern-day Turkey), a place easily accessible to the majority of delegates, particularly those of [[Early centers of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Famagusta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salamis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Famagusta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salamis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Human rights in Northern Cyprus

Hello, could you please elaborate on your reasons on the talk page of the article to revert this edit, in the light of what I perceive as the unreliability of the source as noted here? I would greatly appreciate it if you commented regarding your view about the merits of the source. Thank you. --GGT (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And may I kindly ask you to explain your referral to User:E4024 in this edit summary, for I cannot comprehend its relevance? --GGT (talk) 20:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of of Cyprus listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of of Cyprus. Since you had some involvement with the List of of Cyprus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Reyk _YO! 15:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]