User talk:2003 LN6

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; s/2; s/ 1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

User page Talk page Sandbox Contributions Logs Rights Achievements Userboxes Awards Essays Pages Status

This is 2003 LN6's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1: 4 months

Nomination of Martialis (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martialis (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martialis (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 04:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a mess, because you tried to "move" a page by copying and pasting, thus losing the history of the cognomen page. Please don't do this. If you want to retitle a page, use "Move": if you can't, then use one of the methods on WP:RM, to get it moved or, if controversial, to start a discussion. Thanks. PamD 12:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Pamela

Hey! As a native speaker of Chinese, could you translate the contents of this site. I'm trying to make a draft on 1954's Typhoon Pamela and this website has info which is needed for what I'm trying to do. OhHaiMark (talk) 18:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OhHaiMark: Could you provide the link to your draft and what information do you need? I am a little busy at the moment but I will assist you when possible. I can find that the page states that its peak winds offshore were 120kts, peak winds in Taiwan reached 25m/s, its lowest pressure is 940 millibars, the place where the winds were highest was Hengchun, the most rain recorded was 231.6mm at Chenggong, Taitung, and that the amount of rain ranked 174th among 381 typhoons surveyed by the Central Weather Administration. The deaths, missing, and injuries columns were blank. 2003 LN 6 04:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here. OhHaiMark (talk) 12:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Optics Valley Suspended Monorail

Hello, 2003 LN6. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Optics Valley Suspended Monorail, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manniella

Hello 2003 LN6,

I'm Joseywales1961, and I patrol new pages here on Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged a page that you created (Manniella) for deletion because it is unnecessary per one of the criteria at WP:G14.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales^Parley 18:57, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseywales1961: I plan to create the other subgenus article soon. It is notable enough for an article. Thank you! 2003 LN 6 19:00, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 13 § 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456 until a consensus is reached. Renerpho (talk) 04:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited addition to lead section of Leafcutter ants

Hello, I have noticed that you have recently reverted my edits on the page leafcutter ant. The problem with that page is that it is quite outdated, and needs extensive restructuring after Amoimyrmex was designated back in 2020 as a third genus of leafcutter ants. I plan to update the article in the coming days to fit this change. Thank you! Sources: [1] [2]. 2003 LN 6 04:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for discussing. As I wrote just now in my edit comment, which it does not seem that you read, "rv, you can't "update" an article by adding "new" and wholly uncited materials to the lead: it's just a summary of the article. Add what you want to the article body, cited to WP:RS, then (if need be) adjust the lead to match". I'm happy to stand by that. If the article is "outdated", then the place to update it is the article body, not the lead. Your edit immediately reduced the quality of the article in two ways: by making the lead inconsistent with the body, and by introducing an uncited claim. That is, to be clear about it, the wrong direction — worse not better. If you plan to do something, make your plans, find your sources, read WP:V and WP:CITE and WP:RS (core policies all of them), then update the article properly, and everybody will thank you for it. As for your hasty edit, it was correctly reverted, with a correct and fully explanatory edit comment. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap Fixed. Thank you. 2003 LN 6 05:37, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: [3][4] and a few others, per Template:Talk header#Should this be added to every talk page?, "This template does not need to be placed on every talk page, and should not be indiscriminately added to talk pages." If you do find a page worthy of {{Talk header}}, please place it according to Wikipedia:Talk page layout#Lead (bannerspace). ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 22:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1967 Tropical Cyclone Report

Hey! Could you translate the Chinese in this Tropical Cyclone Report by the Central Weather Administration and add the info here if you have time? Tavantius (talk) 15:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]