User talk:ساندرا بولقاش

The character Alaa Sarhan owns foreign sources and an article in the French-language Wikipedia encyclopedia. Is the decision to delete it a racist decision against Arabs, or what?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alaa Sarhan (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Karnataka were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alaa Sarhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Karnataka (talk) 18:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ساندرا بولقاش! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Karnataka (talk) 18:57, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have written a new draft that I hope will be reviewed and accepted for publication ساندرا بولقاش (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alaa Sarhan

Hello, ساندرا بولقاش,

I moved your article back to Draft space as you mistakenly moved it to Project/Wikipedia space which is where we put pages about policies and guidelines, not article content. I suggest you not move this page to the main space because I think it is likely to be tagged for deletion. If you have truly rewritten this article, I think you should resubmit it to WP:AFC. While reviewers can be tough, they are trying to give you advice so that your article won't be deleted in main space. It takes time to craft an article that is accepted so it helps if you aren't impatient with the process.

For one thing, you have not used Wikipedia's style for references. Please review Wikipedia:Citing sources for help with formatting. You might also ask for help at the Teahouse or WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors so that the formatting of your article is closer to what we expect from main space content. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alaa Sarhan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alaa Sarhan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaa Sarhan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 12:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Alaa Sarhan. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:36, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Alaa Sarhan. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Statements such as Is the decision to delete it a racist decision against Arabs, or what are inappropriate, see WP:ASPERSIONS. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+ use "~~~~" to sign your comments plz. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ ^TALK 17:13, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alaa Sarhan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alaa Sarhan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Alaa_Sarhan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. asilvering (talk) 00:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alaa Sarhan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alaa Sarhan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaa Sarhan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BangJan1999 01:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello ساندرا بولقاش. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Alaa Sarhan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ساندرا بولقاش. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ساندرا بولقاش|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Alaa Sarhan. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]