Jump to content

User:Evanharmon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'm still very much a Wikipedia novice, but I am slowly trying to change that. I hope to take a more active role in the project as I get more comfortable with the whole process. I suppose the biggest areas I would like to focus on would be philosophy (and thought in general) with a little politics here and there. I will probably end up contributing to some technology-based articles as well since I unintentionally educate myself in that area more than I care to admit.

Pages I Should Start

[edit]
  • appearance-reality distinction
  • pure and impure properties (as in the identity of indiscernibles debate)
  • Max Black's symmetric universe


Pages I Should Contribute To

[edit]


My Wikipedia Contributions


  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.