Template:Did you know nominations/Too Old for This Shift

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Too Old for This Shift

(

)

... that the Casualty episode, "Too Old for This Shift" was criticised by the Midlands Air Ambulance Charity for its "insensitive" helicopter crash? Source: Casualty's helicopter crash plot is blasted as "insensitive" by a real-life air ambulance service
- ALT1:... that Casualty producers worked with the Association of Air Ambulances seven months in advance for the special episode, "Too Old for This Shift". Source: "We’ve been working with the Association of Air Ambulances for about seven months on the storyline"

Reviewed: Bone Bill

Improved to Good Article status by Soaper1234 (talk) and ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk). Nominated by Soaper1234 (talk) at 20:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Article passed GA status and DYK nominated on the same day. QPQ is done. Hook length is within 200 character count limit. I prefer ALT 1 and inline source provided for it. Assuming good faith with rest of the sources and content as it just passed GA review. - Vivvt (Talk) 07:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Vivvt, on reflection I also favour ALT1. Soaper1234 - talk 15:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I am promoting ALT1 but changing "seven months" to "over half a year", since the source says "nearly seven months". Yoninah (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)