Talk:Yakovlev Yak-1000

Yakovlev Yak-1000 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 17, 2020. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Yakovlev Yak-1000 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the entire rear fuselage and tail of the Soviet Yakovlev Yak-1000 aircraft was removable to allow access to the engine?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/November.

Wikipedia

Aviation: Aircraft / Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the Soviet aviation task force.

Military history: Aviation / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Text and/or other creative content from Yakolev Yak-1000 was copied or moved into Yakovlev Yak-1000 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merge from Yakolev Yak-1000

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Closed with consensus to Merge. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 00:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More or less duplicate article with wrong name. Some content should be merged into this one and redirected. --Denniss (talk) 14:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 15:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~Oppose~~ No, two entirely separate aircraft developed around the same time using different engines. Read a bit more carefully.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned on the Yak-140 page, I believe you're confusing the pages. Nobody's proposing merging Yak-140 and Yak-1000, but rather the spelling-error-of-manufacturer pages of those two aircraft into the properly Yakovlev Yak-140 and Yak-1000 pages respectively.

Support. - The Bushranger _{Return fire}^{Flank speed} 16:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blush, I hadn't even noticed the differences in spelling.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yakovlev Yak-1000/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 23:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Forward and rear fuel tanks held 430 litres (95 imp gal; 110 US gal) and 167 litres (37 imp gal; 44 US gal) respectively" - I think there ought to be a comma before respectively
Any page numbers for Gordon et al. for the specifications?
What does "Status unknown" in the infobox indicate?
- You mean Status Unflown?
I really only see one thing where coverage could be expanded. Why was the whole project conceived? I'm assuming there's some Cold War arms race stuff for the reason why, but there's no explanation of this in the article. If there's specific background information known about why the Soviets were tinkering around with high-speed aircraft, that would be useful.
- This is the period before air-to-air missiles when speed was king for fighters, so everybody wanted aircraft fast as possible. But that background really isn't covered in the sources

That's it, I think. Tidy little article. Hog Farm _Bacon 01:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I think that I need to dust off one of my ancient AFV or artillery articles since you've now done two out of the three!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]