This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
If the law was passed in 1999, and off the books three years later in 2002, why is the Bell's Brewery pullout from 2006 mentioned as being caused by this law?
--Stacecom (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please reread the article as I think you're missing a key point. Also, read the cited source as that will probably answer any further questions you have. - Who is John Galt?✉14:40, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Bell's should not be there, as it pulled distribution after a dispute with a beer wholesaler. The 1982 beer franchise law is what was at issue, and not the Wine and Spirits Fair Dealing Act, which as mentioned above, was already off the books. I'm removing it. (Snakesonaplane1988 (talk) 18:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC))[reply]
It's related only in similarity of the laws, and the Chicago Reader article makes it clear that they are different laws. The fact is they are/were two separate laws. Read the beer franchise laws here: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=2384&ChapterID=67 . They don't mention wine or liquor. Bell's decision to pull their distribution, while interesting in and of itself, was NOT motivated by the Wirtz law. That law covered wine and liquor, not beer, and was already off the books when the Bell's event happened. I'm removing the discussion of Bell's, but I'll add reference to the beer franchise laws. Snakesonaplane1988 (talk) 02:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"It's related .... in similarity of the laws", which is why it's pertinent to the article. It provides historical background for the newer, failed Wirtz law. The beer distributor named "National Wine and Spirits" was actually just the local name for Glaser's Distributors, which was purchased by Wirtz Corp in 2008 [1]. I added clarifications to the article. EnPassant (talk) 14:04, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The auto franchise laws are similar too, should we devote a lengthy paragraph to them also? The purchase you mentioned happened after Bell's re-entered distribution in Illinois, so again it is irrelevant. Since you seem adamant about it, I'll leave it up. I'll consider making a new page for the beer franchise laws, and linking to it, or expanding the scope of this page to cover both, or someone else could do it. Would you object to that solution? (since again, the Wirtz act did not cover beer). Snakesonaplane1988 (talk) 02:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Wine and Spirits Fair Dealing Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
