Jump to content

Talk:WITI (TV)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wake-Up

[edit]

Used to be about NEWS.Now i tune to 12 or 58 for REAL News.

    • I disagree with the above comment. Seems like Channel 6 has the "real news" that the other stations have, but just has a lot more local content to fill.

Call sign letters

[edit]

While the call letters appear to stand for Wisconsin Independent Television, Inc, that acronym was not the reason for the assignment of WITI. Nearly every broadcast channel east of the Mississippi were automatically assigned call signs that start with W. The founders of the station who applied for the FCC license were "Independent Television, Inc" [1], and when approved, they were assigned WITI. It is a nice coincidence that the W can also stand in for Wisconsin. Perhaps the article should mention this, rather than leaving the impression that they picked WITI because the station is in Wisconsin. Not a dog 23:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct re: the meaning of their call letters. Ted Perry mistakenly added the "Wisconsin" in their 50th anniversary segment, and at least one other website also uses that erroneous meaning. Nitelinger 01:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I Wish the Old FOX 6 Logo deserves to be changed into one of the "FOX News Edge Mandate" with the 2 edgier logos of "FOX 6 MILWAUKEE" (General) & "FOX 6 NEWS" (Newscasts) this season. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.236.99.249 (talk) 01:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WITI-TV6-large.jpg

[edit]

Image:WITI-TV6-large.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

On September 29th, 2007, FOX 6 changed their logo colors to matck the FOX O&O colors. Also, all of their on air graphics were changed too. Does anyone have a new image of the logo (the FOX is White w/ red background, the Six is white with blue background. That would be a good addition to this page WisconsinCheeze 14:31, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:MyFoxMilwaukee.gif

[edit]

Image:MyFoxMilwaukee.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alternate WITI 2003 Logo.png

[edit]

Image:Alternate WITI 2003 Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed "Wake-Up Slogans"

[edit]

I removed the WakeUp Slogans area as they weren't really slogans as much as they were lyrics to their image campaign song. -StephenWeinstein (talk) 21:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 00:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WITI (TV). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 April 2017

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Uncontested technical move. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 15:59, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WITI (TV) → WITI-TV – U.S. TV station articles seem to be standardly disambiguated with the "-TV" appended to the station call letters (e.g. KPIX-TV), rather than by parenthetical disambiguation. Not sure why this one uses the latter, but as I said that seems to be non-standard. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 14:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
  • No one was notified of this discussion at all. The station's calls are WITI without the -TV suffix, and I will move for it to return to the former title. Next time, please inform someone of the move discussion outside of the page banner. Nate • (chatter) 13:12, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I have reverted the contested move. Please continue to discuss and if appropriate open a fresh RM discussion. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WITI (TV). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WITI (TV). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:WITI_(TV)&oldid=1206063770"