Talk:Triangular bipyramid

Triangular bipyramid has been listed as one of the Mathematics good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 27, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Polyhedra

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polyhedra, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of polygons, polyhedra, and other polytopes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolyhedraWikipedia:WikiProject PolyhedraTemplate:WikiProject PolyhedraPolyhedra
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 24 October 2024.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Untitled section

59.88.114.15 17:20, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Bhaswanth::::---------> Actually the diagram showing what a triangular bipyramid is the correct one. But the graphic representation of it which is at the last line of the article, is not the actual correct representaion of it. It has for the two(2) pyramids base as a square but it must contain a another triangle for its base.[reply]

Inconsistency?

Second sentence of article: It is the dual of the triangular prism with 6 isosceles triangle faces...

In section Dual polyhedron: The dual polyhedron of the triangular bipyramid is the triangular prism, with five faces: two parallel equilateral triangles linked by a chain of three rectangles.

Looks like first sentence is wrong. Jumpow (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WTF images?

The images in this article of the triangular bipyramid are seriously awful. They had me thinking for a good hour that this was some kind of weird configuration of points and not intuitive at all. And then I look up images of it anywhere else and it's just an equilateral triangle with two opposite points. Cstanford.math (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

the graph

The triangular bipyramid is represented by a graph with nine edges, constructed by adding one vertex connecting to three other vertices of wheel graph representing a square pyramid.

I do not follow this. The square pyramid has five vertices; the 3-bipyramid has five vertices. What vertex is added, and to which three is it joined? Did you mean to say that a vertex is added to the tetrahedron graph?

Every convex polyhedron has a corresponding polyhedral graph, and I question the need to mention it. —Tamfang (talk) 01:07, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamfang Oh yeah. It should be tetrahedron graph. The source from Tutte described

W_{4}

as tetrahedra graph, instead of square pyramid. My apologies, but will check it again later. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 01:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Well done Dedhert.Jr. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 01:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Triangular bipyramid/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Dedhert.Jr (talk · contribs) 00:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 01:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

After a good check, I think this is ready for promotion. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 01:16, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.