Talk:The Boat Races 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Boat Races 2017 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The Boat Races 2017 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 2, 2018.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 30, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
October 24, 2017	Featured article candidate	Promoted

A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 3, 2017.

Current status: Featured article

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rowing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing

To-do list:

Featured Articles:

Raise the rowing (sport) article to featured status.
1. Get article relisted to 'good article status'
2. Put through another round of peer review, see here
3. Nominate for featured status
Ditto for Henley Royal Regatta, The Boat Race , Steve Redgrave

Stubs: see here..

Tag {{Rowing-stub}} onto all rowing stub articles so we can keep track of them.
Expand stubs to at least start class.

Image requests: see here..
Article requests: see here..

Write bios for World Rowing champions (see the redlinks in the templates)

Document FISA database errors

River Thames (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge

University of Oxford Mid‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reserves races

Resolved

There is no description of the reserves' races, not even the winners of each; and they are mentioned only to state (three times) that they occurred on the same day, and used the same course as the main races. If this article is to be assessed as GA, there needs to be somewhat more. See for example The Boat Races 2016#Reserves and other mentions in that article. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They're mentioned in the lead, in the infobox and when I can find a reliable source, they'll be mentioned in the prose. Meanwhile there's a lot more to be reviewed than just the missing reserve race section. If you know of an RS which covers more than just the results of the races, please let me know. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redrose64, still finding it hard to locate any RS about the reserves races. It wouldn't stop a GA though, just because we have no sources. If nothing is reliably and verifiably reporting those races, then Wikipedia safely ignores their existence. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redrose64, did you find anything in reliable sources yet? The Rambling Man (talk) 22:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't. But it's not my WP:BURDEN, since I have added no content concerning reserve races.

My point is that for the article to pass GA, it needs to satisfy all the good article criteria, one of which states "it addresses the main aspects of the topic". The activities of Blondie, Goldie, Isis, and Osiris have been covered in the articles for previous years - so the GA reviewer for this one may see their absence this year as a major omission. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redrose64 That's the point I'm making, if it's not covered anywhere in reliable sources, it can't be here, so therefore whether it's a major omission or not, it's irrelevant, it simply can't exist. It will certainly not preclude it from becoming a GA and, in time, an FA. I didn't put any "burden" on you, I simply asked a polite question as to whether knew of any sources. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Redrose64 and as I mentioned, there's plenty to review in the meantime! The Rambling Man (talk) 04:51, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry, we now have this and this which I will work on incorporating unless someone beats me to it!! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Double hurrah, it's done now! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have some pictures of the reserve races but haven't sorted through them yet. Andrew D. (talk) 08:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Marvellous, but I'm struggling to find any RS coverage of the races outside the results. Do you know of anything that could be used? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:33, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Andrew Davidson I reinserted your Gloriana in what I felt was a more appropriate receptacle. The pre-race excitement of bombs and boatmen was too good to not slam in there. Shame about the result, but didn't the women do well?! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Boat Races 2017. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcasting and Viewership

Why is there no info on viewership on this race apart from an unsourced claim in the lead? LordAtlas (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The lead has no citations for any of its statements. LordAtlas (talk) 01:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All information noted in the lead is repeated and/or expanded upon in the body where references can be found. Cheers for the interest! The Rambling Man (talk) 04:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please show me any citation for "a quarter of a million" who were watching live. That's in the lead and nowhere else. Empty claim. How many people watched this race? You always claim high numbers of millions and all that. I don't doubt you much but at least give some sort of source. LordAtlas (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, see "Around a quarter of a million people lined the length of the course to watch the race.[43]", cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Now I'd like to know why it was so difficult to find and why a broadcasting and reaction section does not exist. If you have time, how about international viewership numbers? Someone always remind people that 250-300 million people around the world always watch and so I think it must be easily sourced. LordAtlas (talk) 06:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't difficult to find. A search on "million" revealed it instantly, along with the source. I have no access to international viewership numbers. If you're interested, feel free to do something about it yourself. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Boat Races 2017/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 01:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Looks good to me

This article meets our GA standards. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Boat Races 2017. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]