Jump to content

Talk:Stay with You (Goo Goo Dolls song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article is unneccessary

[edit]

This article doesn't hold any useful information. The info that is provided can already be inferred. -- FishStik 21:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Stay with You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 April 2019

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move; after extended time for discussion, the community appears to be moving in the opposite direction from the proposal. bd2412 T 04:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– Other song was deleted. Unreal7 (talk) 16:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 23:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nohomersryan:, @Crouch, Swale: is it worth it for a 51-charting song from 4 songs? In ictu oculi (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@In ictu oculi: if you think the Lemon Jelly song is notable why don't you make a request at WP:REFUND since it was deleted via PROD you can. If you can establish notability of it then I'll probably withdraw my support however if none of the others are notable then WP:SONGDAB would apply. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Or perhaps just prod the Goo Goo Dolls song. It seems no more notable than a song which charted lower in the UK than the LJ song. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I do query whether either song passes WP:NSONG. Narky Blert (talk) 13:27, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've struck my "support" above, now the other article has been restored that argument no longer applies and neither one of these songs appears to be more significant than the other. If people have notability concerns they should deal with it at AfD rather than trying to have that discussion here. PC78 (talk) 00:11, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes I think (as I pointed out above) that given that the arguments no longer apply it would be better to close this as no consensus to move at this time and then once we have determined the notability of both (and any others) and we have view counts we can determine but I think at least we need to let the dust settle. Indeed if the Goo Goo Dolls song is deemed NN but the Lemon Jelly song is deemed notable we might have this debate in the other direction. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:55, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.