Jump to content

Talk:Spanish Guinea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

White father?

[edit]

Who is the White father? Caeruleancentaur (talk) 01:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preceded to Viceroyalty of Peru?

[edit]

"Spanish Guinea is preceded to Viceroyalty of Peru", But it was established in 1778 and between 1778 and 1810, it was administrated by Viceroyalty of Rio de la Plata. Why Viceroyalty of Peru is predecessor --Propatriamori (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)?[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spanish Guinea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Article

[edit]

This Article is extremely broken because: 1. Barely mentions the initial Spanish presence from 1778 to 1780. 2. The start date of the colony is quite unclear. 3. British presence is barely mentioned. 4. The Status of Spanish Guinea from 1780 to 1843 extremely foggy in the article. Kanto7 (talk) 08:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the brokenness, where is the evidence Portugual "made overtures to take it over in the 60s" Kanto7 (talk) 09:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another problem is that it says the main article is the history of Equatorial Guinea, which itself has barely any info Kanto7 (talk) 21:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion:

1- Governorate of Fernando Poo and Annobón (1778-1827) (need created) es:
2- British occupation of Fernando Poo (1827-1843) (need created) es:
3- Spanish Territories on the Gulf of Guinea (official name), shortened Spanish Guinea (1843-1968) (need redirect)

84.127.185.77 (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also see: List of colonial governors of Spanish Guinea

84.127.185.77 (talk) 18:13, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]