Talk:School of Names

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic / Eastern / Ancient Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Eastern philosophy
	Ancient philosophy

I think the title "Logicians" is misleading when we talk about Chinese philosophers. The name "School of Names" is much more appropriate. Although Chinese thinkers like Gongsun Long and Hui Shi do seem to have similar ideas to Western logicians, calling them logicians could cause misunderstanding. --Kilences 13:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Logicians -- redirect

Please note the discussion at Talk:Logicians#Changes and at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Philosophy#Logicians. Formerly, Logicians redirected exclusively to this article. That has been changed. --David Tornheim (talk) 03:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in School of Names

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of School of Names's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto3":

From Wu wei: Creel (1974), p. 26
From Legalism (Chinese philosophy): Creel, Herrlee Glessner (September 15, 1982). What Is Taoism?: And Other Studies in Chinese Cultural History. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226120478 – via Google Books.
From Pythagoreanism: Richard D. McKirahan (2011). Philosophy Before Socrates (Second Edition): An Introduction with Texts and Commentary: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary. Hackett Publishing. p. 79. ISBN 9781603846127.
From Philosophy of religion: De Cruz, Helen (17 January 2017). "De Cruz, Helen, "Religion and Science", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)".
From Philosophy: Steup, Matthias; Neta, Ram (2020). "Epistemology". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 20 January 2021. Retrieved 21 January 2021.

Reference named "auto14":

From Pythagoreanism: Classical Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources. Greenwood Publishing Group. 2005. p. 317. ISBN 9780313321788. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
From Legalism (Chinese philosophy): Creel, 1974. Shen Pu-hai: A Chinese Political Philosopher of the Fourth Century B.C.

Reference named "auto":

From Socialism: Goldman, Emma. "What it Really Stands for Anarchy". Anarchism and Other Essays. Anarchism, then, really stands for the liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government. Anarchism stands for a social order based on the free grouping of individuals for the purpose of producing real social wealth; an order that will guarantee to every human being free access to the earth and full enjoyment of the necessities of life, according to individual desires, tastes, and inclinations.
From Atheism: "The rise of Arab atheism". June 29, 2015. Archived from the original on February 6, 2016. Retrieved February 8, 2016.
From Confucius: Kirkendall, Jensen Armstrong (2017-12-14). "The Well-Ordered Heart: Confucius on Harmony, Music, and Ritual" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-04-13. Retrieved 2021-04-13.
From Social constructionism: Galanes, Gloria J.; Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy (2009). "Communication as social construction: Catching ourselves in the act". In Galanes, Gloria J.; Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy (eds.). Socially constructing communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. pp. 1–9.
From Pyrrhonism: Beckwith, Christopher I. (2015). Greek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia (PDF). Princeton University Press. p. 28. ISBN 9781400866328.
From John Rawls: Moore, Matthew J. (2009). "Political Theory Today: Results of a National Survey". Rochester, NY. SSRN 1463648. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
From Philosophy of happiness: "Summa Theologica: How God is known by us (Prima Pars, Q. 12, a. 4)". www.newadvent.org.
From Echo chamber (media): Diaz Ruiz, Carlos; Nilsson, Tomas (16 May 2022). "EXPRESS: Disinformation and Echo Chambers: How Disinformation Circulates in Social Media Through Identity-Driven Controversies". Journal of Public Policy & Marketing: 074391562211038. doi:10.1177/07439156221103852. S2CID 248934562 – via DOI.org (Crossref).
From Qi: Novella, Steven (19 October 2011). "Reiki". Science-Based Medicine. Archived from the original on 11 April 2015.
From Philosophy: "Major Ethical Perspectives". saylordotorg.github.io. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 21 January 2021.
From Philosophy of religion: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "Philosophy of Religion."
From Legalism (Chinese philosophy): Hansen, Chad (August 17, 2000). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195350760 – via Google Books.
From Critical theory: Fazio, Giorgio (21 May 2021). "Situating Rahel Jaeggi in the Contemporary Frankfurt Critical Theory". Critical Horizons. 22 (2): 116. doi:10.1080/14409917.2019.1676943. S2CID 210490119.
From Relationship between religion and science: "Jewish Biographies: Nobel Prize Laureates". Jewish Virtual Library.
From Islamic philosophy: "Guardian cartoon of cow in relation to Priti Patel sparks outrage amongst diaspora in Britain". The Hindu. 9 March 2020. Archived from the original on 11 September 2020. Retrieved 6 August 2020.
From Objectivism: "About the Author" in Rand 1992, pp. 1170–1171
From Philosophy in Taiwan: zh:洪子偉 [in Chinese] (2016). "日治時期臺灣哲學系譜與分期". 存在交涉：日治時期的臺灣哲學. 聯經. pp. 15–37. OCLC 952951598.
From Subjective idealism: Downing, Lisa. "George Berkeley". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved May 21, 2019.
From Mind–body dualism: "Summa Theologiae: Man who is composed of a spiritual and a corporeal substance: and in the first place, concerning what belongs to the essence of the soul (Prima Pars, Q. 75)". www.newadvent.org. Archived from the original on 19 January 2012.
From Slavery: "Erskine May on Slavery in Britain (Vol. III, Chapter XI)". Retrieved 2 November 2017.
From Wu wei: Creel (1982), p. 67
From Śūnyatā: "Sanskrit - Asien.net".
From Existential nihilism: Veit, W. (2018). Existential Nihilism: The Only Really Serious Philosophical Problem – Journal of Camus Studies 2018: 211-236. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26965.24804
From Pythagoreanism: Christoph Riedweg (2008). Pythagoras: His Life, Teaching, and Influence. Cornell University Press. p. 26. ISBN 9780801474521.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:53, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shen Buhai

I copied and rewrote info on Deng-Xi and Shen Buhai here. Since attribution is requested, I'm the one who put together the writing in question from the other wikipedia pages in the first place, with credit to my sources.~ FourLights (talk) 16:32, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]