Talk:SAGEM

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Fair use rationale for Image:SAGEM.JPG

Image:SAGEM.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consider revising "among one of the world's largest." The phrase should either be "among the world's largest" or "one of the world's largest."24.0.17.83 23:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from SAGEM Sigma 30

SAGEM Sigma 30 is a product made by SAGEM, and I'm not sure if it should have its own article. Should it be merged here? Is it sufficiently notable that it should have its own article? Google produces 64 hits, first of which is wikipedia. WLU (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC). ------[reply]

Sounds a good idea --Farialima (talk) 17:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - It's a product, not a company. WP covers many products. If notability is not proven, it should be nominated for deletion, but product details shouldn't be on a company page. - BilCat (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:SAGEM/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

how does the company pronounce its name SAGEM?

Last edited at 20:13, 1 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 05:10, 30 April 2016 (UTC)