This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article says the magazine ceased publication in 1967. But an external link to covers of the magazine show it was published at least until 1977.Jtcarpet (talk) 04:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Greenleaf-produced version of Rogue lasted 10 years. The later version, produced by the much less interesting folks at Douglas Publications, is the one that lasted another decade or so. --Orange Mike | Talk02:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This article seems to have been pasted together with a lot of content from the memoirs and articles of Earl Kemp and Frank M. Robinson (both fine people and excellent writers whom I have had the honor to know), including some overt plagiarism. It badly needs the hands of a firm editor who knows the field and has the time to spare. --Orange Mike | Talk02:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
