This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
The notability hangs, for me, on the elements behind paywalls that I have been unable to inspect. Pinging DGG who has an interest in this draft. Please note that this analysis is my own opinion, and is a subjective analysis unless and until modified and/or ratified by oyther editors in good standing.
Discussion coming tomorrow. As usual, we mostly but not completely agree--we look with slightly different concerns,& I think I can get to some of the paywalled articles. DGG ( talk ) 08:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TerryBG Please read and understand WP:RS. Further reading is at WP:RSP. Please understand PR and Press Release material, whether issued verbatim or rehashed or regurgitated in some manner, adds precisely nothing to WP:N. Recognising PR material is very easy. I used to write a great deal of it professionally. Anything that even feels like PR does not belong on any list of potentially useful sources FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me21:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]