Talk:Richie Rich (film)

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Comic book / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comics: Films Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus^(talk) 01:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Move Ri¢hie Ri¢h to Richie Rich (film). Per naming conventions, article titles are based on English usage, not corporate logos or advertising fonts.[reply]

Survey

Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Support as nom. Kafziel ^Talk 17:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. I see no reason for any exceptions here. --67.68.152.212 20:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support seems cut-and-dried. --Groggy Dice T|C 08:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yath 14:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Movie is credited as "Ri¢hie Ri¢h", this does not go against WP:UE. See I ♥ Huckabees or How to Beat the High Co$t of Living.--Hús ö nd 21:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to ~~Strong Oppose~~. Richie Rich already contains the article about the comics and there's no need to merge the articles.--Hús ö nd 00:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - The new location will be Richie Rich (film), not Richie Rich. This isn't a merge proposal, it's a move proposal. Kafziel ^Talk 12:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Oh, right. Back to regular ~~Oppose~~ then.--Hús ö nd 13:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      - Once again I change my stance, this time to neutral, as per Patstuart's argument.--Hús ö nd 20:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above and the fact that no one is going to type Ri¢hie Ri¢h into the search bar to find this. 205.157.110.11 00:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, that's why we have redirects.--Hús ö nd 00:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the closest we can get from WP:NC is under the band section: Do not replicate stylized typography in logos and album art, though a redirect may be appropriate (for example, KoЯn redirects to Korn (band)). Also see Toys "Я" Us redirecting to Toys "R" Us - sorry Husond :( Patstuart^talk|edits 19:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Rich family are not multi-trillionaires. It's clearly stated in the beginning parts of the movie that they are multi-billionaires. Please do not change it to multi-trillionaires, as that's not correct. 173.27.114.25 (talk) 17:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Surnames of females

Would anyone know where the surname Pazinski comes from? The end credits only say "Gloria" and "Diana". Were the surnames referenced within the film? I had thought Gloria to be Gloria Glad, for example.

Does Diane give her full name to Cadbury at some point? If so, even if she were named Pazinski, I don't think her being Gloria's mother would necessarily mean that Gloria shares her surname, as children may have the surname of the father (perhaps a Mr. Glad) meaning that she may not be Gloria Pazinski.

Would like to know the source, if anyone happens to have a clip of the name being said (or referenced outside the film?) or if they could name the time within the film the surname Pazinski is used. Ranze (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richie Rich (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427002602/http://www.ncfilm.com/_userfiles/File/Made%20in%20NC%20--%20List%20of%20Films/Made%20in%20North%20Carolina%2004-02-07%20UPDATE.pdf to http://www.ncfilm.com/_userfiles/File/Made%20in%20NC%20--%20List%20of%20Films/Made%20in%20North%20Carolina%2004-02-07%20UPDATE.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]