Talk:On Ayn Rand

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the On Ayn Rand article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Objectivism (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Objectivism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ObjectivismWikipedia:WikiProject ObjectivismTemplate:WikiProject ObjectivismObjectivism articles

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

balance anyone?

EVERY of these authors (reviews) has been a randist...this is not randpedia
fun fact: http://www.wju.edu/academics/bus/iscm/Younkins.asp
he is a prof. for accountancy, and not a "scholar" relating to philosophy, as it is sneakily implied
Paranoid Android1208 (talk) 15:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you know of reviews from others, you are welcome to either add them to the article or provide source information on the talk page so that other editors can do so. --RL0919 (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We'll definitely have to remove the Younkin part. It's just atrociously sneaky.
Paranoid Android1208 (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]