Talk:No. 51 Squadron RAF

Fair use rationale for Image:51 Squadron RAF.gif

Image:51 Squadron RAF.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 04:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Claims about Saddam's capture.gif

I'd love to believe it's true, and 51 are so quiet about their achievements that the complete lack of any other sources to support the claim does not mean that it's wrong. The RAF would be quite happy for the US forces to attribute the capture to a Humint tip-off (as they did), and to forego the credit. But I've never seen the claim ANYWHERE else...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.242.20.166 (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No. 51 Squadron RAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120325162031/http://www.defencemanagement.com/news_story.asp?id=16738 to http://www.defencemanagement.com/news_story.asp?id=16738

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)