Talk:NOFX discography

The Album

I can so no reason why The Album should not be included in this discography. http://www.nofxwiki.net/w/The_Album provides photographic proof if it's existence as an official release on Mystic Records, yet Fezmar9 continually reverts edits adding it to the discography. His point is that another wiki isn't a reliable source. I don't quite see what the source of the proof is matters though when it's photographs documenting the physical media.

I was not questioning its existence, I was questioning its notability for inclusion and whether or not it's a studio album. All tracks on The Album are also featured on Maximum Rocknroll and half the tracks were previously released on NOFX with some of the other tracks being found on other previously released records that are also not included in this discography. So could The Album be an extended re-issue of the NOFX EP? A compilation of previously released material? An unofficial release? To establish the notability of The Album for inclusion, a reliable source should be provided to verify information about the release. The discographies on reliable sites such as billboard.com and allmusic do not include this release, so why should wikipedia? Fezmar9 (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your well-known for spreading your own narrow-minded mis-information amongst NOFX pages, Please cease Fezmar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.205.76 (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not narrow minded. The album that you continuously add to this discography, The Album, does not meet the Wikipedia general notability guidelines for an article. If a stand alone article is not warranted, then why bother mentioning it here? Can any information about this record be provided via a third-party published source? Simply existing does not establish notability. The significance of this album needs to be obvious to both our readers AND editors using published sources. If none can be provided, than this record should not be mentioned here. Plain and simple. Fezmar9 (talk) 19:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Split singles from EPs?

I think we should split out the singles from the EPs, since I really don't think a two-song 7" counts as an EP. Thought? -Joltman (talk) 13:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NOFX discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081226231128/http://www.epitaph.com/artists/album/148 to http://epitaph.com/artists/album/148

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]