Talk:Meg Waite Clayton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Margaret1959 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Article cleanup

As Wikipedia autobiographies go, this one was pretty clean but still it has needed the benefit of a little neutral attention. In that regard I've removed things like an upcoming book per WP:Crystal and WP:Promotion, unsourced honors like Order of the Coif at UM, and one of the three complete listings of the subject's books, which were excessive in an article of this short length. It still reads a bit like a publisher's bio blurb and I may tweak it a bit more (I think the autobio template should stay for now) but it's improved. JohnInDC (talk) 11:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"National bestseller"

I don't mean to be pedantic but if we're going to call a book a "national best seller" it needs a better source than the bookcover. The best I could find was a #8 Bay Area ranking in the SF Chronicle, which I'm adding to the text. If there is a better source, please add it; but please don't add as citations things that don't support the text. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I followed the supplied Random House link and searched related tabs but found nothing about the book's sales or its appearance on any list. Please help me sort his out with a good link, because the assertion still appears to lack a source. JohnInDC (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I searched around a bit more generally via Google, and specifically searched the the NYT website, and was unable to come up with any support for "national" bestseller, so I've removed the adjective. JohnInDC (talk) 10:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply from the subject of this article:

USA Today bestseller list: ttps://www.usatoday.com/story/life/books/2013/06/21/the-wednesday-sisters/2444877/isbn/9780345507846/

Article in the NY Times titled Target Can Make Sleepy Titles into Bestsellers: https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/books/22target.html?searchResultPosition=1

In Canada, #3 behind Margaret Atwood and Stephen King: https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/books/2019/10/09/toronto-star-bestsellers-for-the-week-ending-oct-9-2019.html

Editions published all over the world: https://www.megwaiteclayton.com/international-editions/

Request for help

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

This page is about me and there is nothing here I don’t think that isn’t factually supported. (I just added two missing books myself.) Is it possible to get the disclaimer at the top of the removed? Thanks. (I’m sure my team at HarperCollins can verify if you need anything more) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.126.98.211 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The tag was placed in the article 7 years ago. It did look as though the article might have been created by the person it is about, but that was never certain. The creator of the article said that it wasn't her. Furthermore, and more importantly, there doesn't seem to be any problem in the article caused by being created or editing by the person it is about, even if that is true. In view of all those facts, I don't see any good reason why the tag should be there, so I shall remove it. JBW (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]