Talk:Margot Robbie

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Margot Robbie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2023, when it received 11,041,143 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 8 times. The weeks in which this happened:

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Australia: Queensland / Cinema / Television Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Margot Robbie is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australian cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Margot Robbie has a child now, why isn't that here?

https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2024-11-04/margot-robbie-baby-tom-ackerley-boy

https://www.vogue.com/article/margot-robbie-gives-birth-to-her-first-child

https://people.com/margot-robbie-welcomes-first-baby-with-husband-tom-ackerley-source-8722108 Cahlin29 (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because according to some editors, unless Robbie or her team confirms the pregnancy, we’re all just imagining all the pictures of pregnant Robbie or of her out and about with a baby stroller. Nothing to see here, apparently, just move along. Rcarter555 (talk) 07:36, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Genuinely upsetting to see this. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rcarter555, @Krimuk2.0 Hi, so what about Harper's Bazaar?

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/uk/celebrities/news/a62800242/margot-robbie-gives-birth-first-baby-tom-ackerly/

Or this?

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/celebrity-photos/margot-robbie-steps-out-with-newborn-son-after-quietly-giving-birth/news-story/2ef11b42255adcf35fdd3a593d73a96b

Lililolol (talk) 18:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I think it’s enough. But even those articles reference the people magazine article (“according to reports” is apparently not good enough for some). Yes, those pictures seem self evident, but according to some unless Robbie herself or some representative of her mentions it, we’re just seeing things. I gave up fighting against some pedantic editors here. Rcarter555 (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]