Jump to content

Talk:Marble House

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MArble House (band)

[edit]

There is a band called marble house so this page needs to be disambiguation page and 2 more pages need to be created. i dont know how to do it... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.241.245.73 (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The Marble House in Newport is by far more notable. The others can be listed at Marble House (disambiguation). Charles 04:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marble House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Should the lede image be changed?

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The !vote tally is: 4 1/3 !votes for image 1, 1/2 !vote for image 2 and 15 1/6 !votes for image 3 (1-3-2 !vote counted as 2/3—1/3—0). Moreover, the arguments on image #3 quality and positioning are convincing and have been entertained by the majority of posters here. There is therefore consensus to change the lead image to image 3 (File:Marble House, Newport RI.jpg). Since the infobox already contains image #3 at the time of closure, no actions have to be made.Szmenderowiecki (talk) 12:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Image #1 (current lede image)
Image #2 (suggested replacement)

Should the lede image be changed from Image #1 to Image #2? Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]

Discussion

[edit]
  • Let's look at the WP:CANVASSING page, shall we? The page explicitly permits the notification of "editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article." Ken has uploaded thousands of files, the vast majority of which are photographs of Rhode Island. Not to mention his thousands of edits to pages directly related to Rhode Island. If thousands of images and edits don't meet the threshold for "substantial edits," I'd like to know how many do? Should I wait for hundreds of thousands? Millions? Please let me know. Filetime (talk) 02:08, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not automatically canvassing to ping someone to a discussion -- only if you do so because you think that person will vote a certain way. That said, the appearance of canvassing can matter, too, and in this case it's ultimately unnecessary because I'm fairly sure Kzirkel watches the WikiProject Rhode Island page (as do I), and a neutral notice there should make it unnecessary to ping. In other words, I think it's unlikely Filetime's done anything wrong in this regard, but if it's not ultimately necessary, there's no need to further inflame these threads (which already run rather hot). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:31, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.