Talk:London Buses route 406

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect to List of bus routes in London?

Wondering whether to WP:BRD and just redirect this page to List of bus routes in London? It's not all that notable for anything - the history section is purely extensions and changes of operator, the sort of thing which is covered on Fandom anyway (so basically it's Fancruft). Any objections, or should I just do it? Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how removing content benefits the wiki, and I don't think it's right to dismiss something someone was clearly passionate about as "fancruft"

I don't see how removing content benefits the wiki, and I don't think it's right to dismiss something someone was clearly passionate about as "fancruft". You could use that argument to dismiss anything you don't like. Garuda3 (talk) 17:24, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See this Fandom page - the content there is almost exactly the same structure and style as here, so I don't believe it really has any notability for an encyclopaedia beyond it existing. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A topic being on another wiki isn't an identifier for if it's notable or not. I run a wiki, Coasterpedia, with some overlap with Wikipedia in terms of content but nobody would argue that roller coasters should be deleted from Wikipedia as a result. Garuda3 (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article was nominated for deletion in 2016 with an outcome of no consensus. Ajf773 (talk) 20:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]