This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Katy Perry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Katy Perry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Katy PerryWikipedia:WikiProject Katy PerryTemplate:WikiProject Katy PerryKaty Perry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
It's better to request a move than
to make a quick redirect, since this established article already has a history of edits. And the other existing article doesn't really have a history of edits, just some quick redirects and categories. Is it Juan? (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is the only track titled "Lifetimes" that even warrants a page, so using "(song)" is a sufficient parenthetical per WP:CONCISE. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:29, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a point in that note when the song itself has no article and doesn't warrant one, plus these aren't the only two tracks to have that title. There's a song of the same name by Slam which also has no page and I also doubt it would qualify for one in the foreseeable future. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The hatnote should be something like {{For|other songs with similar names|Lifetime (disambiguation){{!}}Lifetime}}. Topics do not need to be the main subject of an article in order to merit a disambiguation hatnote. — BarrelProof (talk) 22:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the nominator's rationale and the above discussion. This is the only song with this title that has an article so the additional disambiguation is not necessary. I think a hat note could be helpful, but I believe the more general one would be more beneficial than one specifically for the Sheryl Crow song. Aoba47 (talk) 23:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Apparently (per this revert), SNUGGUMS continues to disagree with the need for a hatnote. I may not follow up further on that issue immediately, but I think the hatnote is needed. As far as I know, there is no Wikipedia policy or guideline that says a topic needs to be the main subject of an article in order to merit a hatnote, and in fact WP:DAB explicitly says otherwise in its opening sentence. — BarrelProof (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My removal actually had nothing to do with whether this is a primary topic; I specifically said in the linked edit summary that the other songs have no articles in the first place. With that in mind, pointing towards a DAB that has no other "Lifetimes" song links is pointless. In fact, aside from a LifeTimes album article, all of the entries that merit pages are instead titled "Lifetime", so I'm not convinced there's any benefit of pointing to a bunch of things that use singular form instead of plural. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:44, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Did you miss the part of the opening sentence of WP:DAB that refers to "a subtopic covered by an article in addition to the article's main topic", or these two other "Lifetimes" songs listed on the Lifetime page?
That applies more to DAB page listings than it does linking to a DAB on other articles. Had either of those other songs warranted articles, we could just use their individual links instead, and for what it's worth I wouldn't recommend listing names with plural form on a page that mainly focuses on the singular form. We'd be better off just using a link to the album I mentioned earlier when that actually has its own page and I highly doubt anybody would be more likely to first search for tracks that don't even merit their own pages. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 11:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]