Talk:Lam Dorji

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Bhutan Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

On 26 August 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Lam Dorji (military personnel). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lam Dorji. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223115014/http://www.kuenselonline.com/his-majesty-the-king-awards-decoration-medals/ to http://www.kuenselonline.com/his-majesty-the-king-awards-decoration-medals/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus, to enable a future RM to look at this again if needed, as many responses have noted that it's too soon to decide on a primary topic, due to the recency of the Olympic event that has affected the pageviews for Lam Dorji (archer).

Lam Dorji (general) was noted as a viable alternative, but there does not appear to be a consensus to move the article, especially given the argument that the general may be the primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 14:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lam Dorji → Lam Dorji (military personnel) – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 23:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ASUKITE 14:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support the archer has 245 views compared with only 148[[1]] for the military personnel. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SUpport, create DAB at basename.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Clear primary topic by long-term significance over the brief article on the archer. Of course he has more views - he's just competed in the Olympics (in which he came 28th!)! Pure WP:RECENTISM. But otherwise, it should be Lam Dorji (general). I can't believe that nobody above has noticed the bizarre proposed disambiguator! "Personnel" is plural and we never use this sort of thing as a disambiguator. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, too soon. Page view analysis shows that any notability from Lam Dorji (archer) would most likely be a result of the 2024 Summer Olympics. A hat note disambiguator will suffice, at least until we can show sustained interest such that the nominators "no clear PRIMARYTOPIC" argument stands. Bobby Cohn (talk) 00:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Military history and WikiProject Bhutan have been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 14:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as proposed, no objection to Lam Dorji (general). 162 etc. (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too soon - WP:RECENTISM. If necessary, Lam Dorji (general) would be heaps better. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.