Jump to content

Talk:Karol G

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discography

[edit]

Her discography keeps getting longer and should have a page of it's own by now Beastbrat (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If that is done now, this article would become a stub (with just one section), which isn't proper per WP:SPLIT. Flooded with them hundreds 07:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for expansion

[edit]

https://www.npr.org/sections/altlatino/2017/12/21/567803247/alt-latinos-favorites-the-songs-of-2017

https://www.npr.org/sections/altlatino/2019/05/09/721150767/tres-palabras-four-songs-our-favorite-latin-songs-this-week

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-latin/karol-g-interview-new-album-ocean-2019-833565/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/garysuarez/2020/01/28/karol-g-and-nicki-minaj-top-billboards-latin-charts-again/#20d773db6526

https://www.papermag.com/karol-g-google-pixel-4-2641249859.html?rebelltitem=48#rebelltitem48

https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/latin/8544948/vote-karol-g-best-songs-2019

https://www.forbes.com/sites/garysuarez/2019/11/19/karol-g-knocks-herself-off-the-top-of-hot-latin-songs-with-some-help-from-nicki-minaj/#7ad1e86b2c45

https://www.vibe.com/2020/03/karol-g-new-album-interview

Basilisk4u (talk) 23:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Karol G/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 14:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

[edit]
  • It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
  • It contains copyright infringements -
  • It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
  • It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -
[edit]
Vice is okay to use for a GA nomination. If it was an FA nomination; it would not.
I've seen AllMusic be used in FA articles.
I'll remove Forbes since that is an unreliable source
Billboard is a high quality sources, and E! works fine too, as long as it is only for GA.
I've been told by other editors who edit music articles that it is.
It is not a publisher. It is a webhost. You need to specify who the creator (channel) is. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:21, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

Lede

[edit]
Yes, I don't know where that is going...
Removed
Removed the sources from the lead.
Wikilinked Latin tap

General

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

[edit]
Feel free. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 22:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Had chance to look at the remainder The Ultimate Boss? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
user:Lee Vilenski apologies for not completing this sooner. Been busy with trying to bring all of Pop Smoke’s articles to Ga, and finishing up high school. I will complete this tomorrow morning. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No issues The Ultimate Boss, did you get chance to look at the remainder? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's been best part of a month, I'm going to fail this one now, feel free to re-nominate at your leisure. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 11:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]