Talk:Junkers Jumo 204

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

The same photo from http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:Jumo205_cutview.JPG is used on three different pages representing different engines of two different manufacturers and three different engine models. In order to achieve some sort of credibility you must verify which of the three engine types this photo actually represents, and remove it from unapplicable pages. PatrickDunfordNZ (talk) 23:15, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See reply here Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 00:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Junkers Jumo 204. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Company pronouns

In English, one may refer to a company as "it" or "them", depending on context. For example one might say "It was founded in 1863", or "They launched their flagship Widget in 1927". There is no fixed rule, nor any WP:MOS guideline here that I am aware of, so editors should not change what others have written just for the sake of it. There needs to be another reason, such as a broader grammatical context. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]