Talk:Junkers Ju 87

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Junkers Ju 87 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Junkers Ju 87 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 19, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
March 4, 2009	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
March 5, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Aircraft

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article has failed an A-Class review.

Germany Mid‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Which is it?

In Design it says they suggested replacing the Kestrel with a DB600 as an interim engine, until the 'final variant' received the Jumo 210. Due to shortages, it was given a 'BMW Hornet engine' (a BMW IV? More detail would be nice. I didn't think BMW made any other inlines anywhere near that power class, and I haven't seen any radial Ju 87s before). Next section, it is saying "These problems were to be resolved by installing the DB 600 engine, but delays in development forced the installation of the Jumo 210 D inverted V-12 engine." So now the Jumo is the interim engine? This is just confusing at best, mistaken at worst.

70.20.32.84 (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looked through some books but none mentioned a DB600. Imagery of V2 does not show a DB600 installed (no port engine air intake). BMW Hornet is the BMW 132 radial engine, a book stating this without proof must be utter garbage. I can't find the DB 600 mentioned again, just claims the Jumo 210A performed poorly in V4 and V2. --Denniss (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ju 87G-1 "influencing the design of the A-10 Thunderbolt"

The rather lengthy discussion in http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:Fairchild_Republic_A-10_Thunderbolt_II about the influence of Pierre Sprey on the A-X Project and the reliability of Coram 2004 as a source ultimately led to the removal of this claim from the article on the A-10 Thunderbolt.

For the sake of consistency, the claim has been removed from this article as well. MK Regular (talk) 21:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MK Regular 2605:B100:D1F:1A0F:C0C2:D74C:A27D:508E (talk) 05:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Change the photo to a gif ?

i think it's better overall for the page and it will be more appealing that the page's photo is a gif

The gif: File:Junkers Ju 87 Stuka.gif Kelcoz (talk) 22:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties aboard S.S. Pavon

A local Dutch source cites about 50 casualties among Dutch military personnel aboard the S.S. Pavon: https://brabantsegesneuvelden.nl/verhalen/de-scheepsramp-met-de-ss-pavon Thus, although she did apparently carry about 1.500 troops, it's probably inaccurate to say that "most of them" were killed in the attack. Roeinerd (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]