Talk:Junkers Ju 46

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Junkers Ju 46 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazilians

The number of Syndicato Condor Ju 46 quoted (2) is from the GoldenYears records of histories post-German reg. Looking at the http://aerobernie.ae.funpic.de/Syndicato%20Condor.html site and checking c/n suggests 3, though two are labelled W 34. It seems as if J2715 (here labelled W 34, the Ju 46 prototype was there as well until w/o in June 1945. However, this list is confusing as there are two c/ns with the same reg PP-CBK.

There is also a Condor timetable cover on another site that shows (in a sketch) what seems to be a Ju 46 from its tail, rigged as a landplane. Does anyone have pics of Condor aircraft to establish if they used Ju 46s as both land- and seaplanes?TSRL (talk) 10:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-10309, Katapult-Flugzeug des Dampfers "Europa".jpg

The picture depicts not the Ju-46, but an Heinkel 58 see http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Heinkel_HE_12. It should be necessary to modify these files: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Junkers_Ju_46. See also the page in italian with the same wrong pict.I do not have found any free one of a real Junkers-46. Philaviami (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I've removed it once before (20090101), but now it's back again. I'll remove it again and try to find out how to re-label it so to avoid another addition.TSRL (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've recategorised both on-ship images as Heinkel civil aircraft, an existing category. With luck that should prevent it happening again.TSRL (talk) 10:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've also added an English caption with details of types etc. to both images.TSRL (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted image?

I noticed that the image in the "Infobox" seems to have been scanned from a book or magazine page, as it even includes some original text in it. I checked in "Commons" and though it states "own work" by the uploader I'm not convinced... can anyone please help verify this? And if needed, replace the existing image by a more appropriate one. Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Junkers Ju 46. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219070818/http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/ to http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]