Jump to content

Talk:James Hughes (sociologist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tag

[edit]

The author of the article should not remove the tag.DGG 01:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Anyway, the sources for the World Transhumanist Association are almost the same ones for James Hughes. --Loremaster 02:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about prod

[edit]

There are plenty of reliable sources for James Huges if anybody had bothered to look...

Village Voice [1]
Daily Herald [2]
Worldwatch Institute [3]
Deseret News [4]
Society for Social Studies of Science [5]
The Guardian [6]
Utne Reader [7]
Reason Magazine [8]
Nashua Telegraph [9]
National Catholic Weekly [10]
Raider News [11]
Friends of Earth [12]
Thomas More Institute [13]
TCS Daily [14]
McGill Daily [15]
CY Daily [16]
New York Inquirer [17]
Macomb Daily [18]
ThisMagazine [19]
Illinois Federation for the Right to Life Daily News [20]
The Quaker Economist [21]
Skeptical News [22]
Action Bioscience [23]
Council for Secular Humanism [24]
The Standard [25]
Radio Netherlands [26]
The New Atlantis [27]

I don't have time to update the page, but the resources above are plenty for anybody who cares to use them. Aelffin 06:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Utne Reader article is the best reference and only using one is sufficient. --Loremaster 18:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notoriety of taking the page of this name?

[edit]

I would like to ask if there has been discussion as to why this person takes the James_Hughes article?

There seem to be both many well known James Hughes' as well as a failure to be that notable. For example, Michel Jordan gets the article about him as his name because that name normally eludes to just him, however John Hughes gets john_Hughes_%28writer%29 because the name John Hughes does not automatically make most people think of that particular man. In the same way I think it would be good to have a page more like http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/John_Hughes for the name James Hughes to give the other well known and notable J Hughes' a chance of a page.

Especially considering his notoriety is based mainly on his mention in other wiki articles or his own projects. Any one else care to lend their two cents? --Curuxz 12:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see from the list of links in the section above, James Hughes (bioethicist) is in fact notable. However, I agree with you that we should create a James Hughes disambiguation page. Are you up to it? --Loremaster 14:49, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I am currently able to since (technically) I have a conflict of interest, being someone with the same name :), but its nice that in theory there is support for the idea of disambiguation. Maybe after I have found/made a few pages on the other notable figures with this name we can change it. --Curuxz 15:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it doesn't matter if you have the same name unless you were planning on creating and/or editing an article on yourself. --Loremaster 16:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is another intresting point, the sources are based on some projects/orginisations that he runs him self. Maybe a disamb page is needed once we can get a list of OTHER notable james hughes's --Curuxz (talk) 11:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, sources for biograhical information on James Hughes are independent articles while sources for his projects and organizations are the websites of these projects and organizations as evidence of their existence. --Loremaster (talk) 16:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah thanks for clearing that up. Out of interest Loremaster would you be good enough to explain your interest in this subject matter. Your impressive editing history seems to have been on a multitude of topics all related to the James Hughes of this page. Do you know him your self? --Curuxz (talk) 19:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My interest in James Hughes comes from my interest in all subject matters directly and indirectly related to transhumanism. Since Hughes is probably the leading transhumanist advocate, it was only a question of time before I became interested in expanding articles directly and indirectly related to him. However, I don't know James Hughes personally but I have interacted online with people who do know him on a professional basis. --Loremaster (talk) 19:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Port South links to to the James Hughes page

[edit]

I'm not sure this is the correct James Hughes, though? (80.121.61.136 (talk) 17:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

its not and we really need a disamb page. Lets start a list of people we would like to have pages and how they should be designated.
  • James Hughes, Writer see http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0400664/
  • James J. Hughes, Current page holder, sociologist and bioethicist teaching health policy at Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut.
I MAY depending on if its allowed submit my own name to have a page, but I think I'll leave that for a good 6 months or so because its a separate issue and it will have to be :at someone else's request. So for now we only have two, ill look out for more tho. --Curuxz (talk) 09:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

default disamb

[edit]

Since out of all the james hughes (including the one the page is about) no single one stands out as being the 'most noteable' would it not be far more sensical to have the page link to the disamb instead of favor this one person?

--Curuxz (talk) 09:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed works

[edit]

What evidence is there that the the 1969 book "A wise child" and the 1971 book "Ends" was written by James Hughes the sociologist? --Loremaster (talk) 20:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

None. They have been removed. --Loremaster (talk) 16:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mentions

[edit]

Is there any precedent in Wikipedia for having a 'Mentions' section? Isn't that what 'What links here' is for? - Crosbie 21:32, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a Wikipedia guideline that forbids a 'Mentions' section? --Loremaster (talk) 22:42, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is that an answer? - Crosbie 22:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Just because something is a precedent doesn't automatically mean that it is against Wikipedia guidelines or policies. That being said, why have you suddently taken an interest in the James Hughes (sociologist) article? --Loremaster (talk) 22:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am considering having myself cybernetically enhanced, but I must be aware of its possible dangers. - Crosbie 22:57, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see... Well, Hughes tends to focus more on the short- and long-term benefits in light of his transhumanist bias so you might want to look for a second opinion... --Loremaster (talk) 23:12, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on James Hughes (sociologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on James Hughes (sociologist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:James_Hughes_(sociologist)&oldid=1257429667"