Talk:James Alexander Ulio
James Alexander Ulio has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 9, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Alexander Ulio article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from James Alexander Ulio appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 January 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
B class review
[edit]C class. This will be B class after two minor fixes are made, as follows. Djmaschek (talk) 21:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Early life and career, paragraph 1, last sentence: not cited.
- Casualty notification, paragraph 2: "It was not unusual for missing soldiers to turn Updates...": End of sentence appears to be missing after the word "turn".
- Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- B class. Djmaschek (talk) 03:08, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:James Alexander Ulio/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 18:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 08:54, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I will review, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 08:54, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments as follows:
Lead
- Suggest treating the Pancho Villa Expedition as separate to World War I
- Moved the sentence about the Pancho Villa Expedition to the previous section. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Early
- The infobox says he served in the Philippine–American War, but in this section his service in the Philippines was a few years afterwards
- The text says he "served in the Philippines from 1906 to 1908"; the Philippine–American War went from 1899 to 1911. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
World War I
- Suggest putting the link for (see American entry into World War I) onto the text "...United States entered World War I..."
- Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- "In March 1918, he..." no need to recite year, already established it is 1918. Same applies to the usage of 1918 in following sentences. Similarly the second usage of 1917 in the previous sentence
- After the Armistice was signed in November 1918,...: seems repetitive since the Armistice has already been mentioned
Between the wars
- After graduation, Ulio was again assigned to the Office of the Adjutant General of the Army from 1931 to 1935.: seems to me the date range should be to 1932, given the way the next paragraph starts
- The year 1931 is correct, as he graduated in June 1931. Re-worded. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Following his promotion to colonel on 1 August 1935, he became chief of staff of the Hawaiian Department.: this seems inconsistent with what is stated in the previous sentence unless he was concurrently on the service command section
- Re-worded. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Some of the years recited in the last paragraph of this section are redundant
- Deleted one. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
World War II
- No issues noted here
Later life
- Does the bronze oak leaf cluster constitute a second award of the DSM? The infobox says two were awarded?
- Yes, it does. The New Zealand equivalent would be a medal bar. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Sources
- The sources themselves seem reliable for what they are used for
- Spot checks done for cites 11 (both instances) and 35 and both are OK
- I get 404 errors when attempting to access the pdf sources.
- The Center of Military History has been moving stuff around, and you now need "www.history.army.mil" instead of "www.history.army.mil". Updated the links. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. More source checks: cites 17, 18, 24, 25, 30 all OK. Zawed (talk) 09:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Other stuff
- Image tags used appropriate
- Dupe links: first lieutenant, captain, major, 'Fort Leavenworth, Kansas'
- Removed the dups. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
That's it for me. Apologies for the delay in coming back to this, other projects and time got away on me. Zawed (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- No worries. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Happy with this one, and am passing as GA as I believe it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:05, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- ... that during World War II, US Army casualty telegrams (example pictured) were sent out in the name of Major General James Alexander Ulio? Source: Mesches, Alan E. (2020). Major General James A. Ulio: Winning World War II from a Desk. Philadelphia: Casemate Publishers. ISBN 978-1-61200-826-4. OCLC 1227652141, pp.23-24
Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: New enough, long enough, hook fact is cited and interesting. Earwig isn't happy, but it's a giant blockquote that it's flagging (from a PD source at that). Image is free, different than what we normally get. Good to go! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- Mid-importance biography (military) articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles