Jump to content

Talk:Hope Sandoval

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Shouldn't descriptions of Mazzy Star's albums go to the Mazzy Star article (which has no album descriptions)?

+Is this /really/ all the information anyone has on her?

copy text

[edit]

cant we add text with permission of other websites? --S.U.H.E.L. 10:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

something to think about

[edit]

if wikipedia dosent allow text to be copied, then this article cant exist in the first place. whoever created it copied all the text from Mazzy star Boulevard website or, from [www.RoughGuides.com Rough Guides ]--S.U.H.E.L. 10:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are right that Wikipedia doesn't allow copyrighted text to be added to articles. Can you give a specific URL where you found this text elsewhere? RoughGuides is a travel site which is unlikely to have an article on Hope Sandoval. I can't find the text of this article on the Mazzy Star Boulevard website, the nearest is the biography of Hope they have which is completely different. Thanks, Gwernol 11:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Post Mazzy Star

[edit]

This was writen in the section (possible vandalism) I deleted it.JoeyGWilliams 22:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{After 1996, Hope began a career of working with other bands. She collaborated with a series of artists, including Air, Bert Jansch, Death in Vegas, Le Volume Courbe, Richard X, The Chemical Brothers, The Jesus and Mary Chain, Twilight Singers, Vetiver, and Massive Attack. As of May of 2007, she will collaborate with Quorthon of Bathory fame for an upcoming release. Themes are said to range from Christmas carols to cannibalism.))

lolt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

years active

[edit]

Why did any users did not put "years active" for Hope Sandoval? --Jasonfitz (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June/July Birthday

[edit]

According to MazzyStar.nu, Hope's Birthday is July. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.84.116 (talk) 21:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo too dark!

[edit]

Does someone have a piccie where we can actually see her face well enough to identify her at a later date? ;-)

I don't wanna choose a new picture unilaterally, but the current photo is INCREDIBLY naff: most people wouldn't even be able to read this article then differentiate her face from oh, 1/2 of the female population (if they've never seen her before reading this WP article...), and one of the easiest-to-fulfill purposes of an encyclopedia entry about a pop-culture personality should be:

...to say "here is the face of the person we wrote this article about"
...to be able to identify them in the future if you see them in a magazine, etc. :-) (at the very least)

72.48.252.105 (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree totally. I have lots of good photos of Hope. Shall I upload one? MazzyEstrella (talk) 02:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(9 years later...) Yes, definitely! Gprobins (talk) 13:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gprobins: MazzyEstrella hasn't edited the site since 2014. I doubt they'll respond. If a better Creative commons image can be found online, please upload it. I saw her live a few times, but each time there was a giant "Absolutely no flash photography" sign at the venue entrance. It left me with the impression that maybe someone on stage suffered from photosensitive epilepsy, so I dared not take a flash picture. The dim lighting made taking a decent non-flash picture impossible. I doubt there's much available online, but if anyone can find a better quality picture, please link it. Otherwise, I can just color-correct the image we have now. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 01:15, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hope Sandoval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]