Talk:GAF Nomad

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal GAF Nomad is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Image copyright problem with Image:Autriservice.gif

The image Image:Autriservice.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Popular culture

An aircraft of this type gained international recognition by being featured in the old The Flying Doctors TV show. The tail number matches up with the green&yellow-striped aircraft in one of the images. But that would need to be verified. --MikeZ (talk) 08:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More tech info needed.

There must be some "wing nuts" around with some more tech info on this machine. Rumours I've heard are: The very expensive swing tail hinges were cast aluminium, and that they simply had a lot of bolts put through them to change the design to fixed tail.

The Army found some evidence of metal fatigue in the tail plane area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.245.37 (talk) 08:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fatigue apparently not a problem. The split Fowler flaps had a chronic 21Hz flutter at low speed. The N24 was unstable with full flaps, so they had max flap set at 10 degrees. Not so smart for a STOL. New flap kits became available to fix the problem. Both models had poor handling at takeoff, and were too sensitive to load distribution. Gipps Aero will need to do a lot of work to put this critter back into the air.203.213.63.240 (talk) 00:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A bit more info, garnered from consensus in the 'Net. 4-Corners had reported serious metal fatigue in the tails. This was a beat up. Trim tabs on the elevators were sometimes found to have small cracks in the skin. Only Army machines seemed to suffer this. Cracks like this are caused by flutter, and can be remedied by small design changes. The M250 engines were mounted upside down, and there were suspected lubrication problems in the reduction boxes. Chip detectors in the gear boxes tended to give false positives, and so were useless. The machine should have been a good performer, and easily beating a DHC-6 in economics. The M250 engines are a good choice for an unpressurized machine that generally operates below 5000m. PT6 turbines have very poor fuel efficiency below this altitude, and are much more expensive.220.244.77.103 (talk) 01:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GAF Nomad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]