Talk:Epistemology of Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 June 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

Philosophy: Epistemology / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Social and political philosophy

Wikipedia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's encyclopedic coverage of itself. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. Please remember to avoid self-references and maintain a neutral point of view, even on topics relating to Wikipedia.WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject WikipediaWikipedia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q2. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Peer to Peer University/Writing Wikipedia Articles (2013 Q2)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Assignment

I'm starting this page as part of the P2P Course on Writing Wikipedia Articles. In hot pursuit of the WikiSOO Burba Badge.

The topic is interesting to me from a few angles. I have been reading a few scholarly articles on the topic so of course I searched Wikipedia and failed to find an article on the main Wikipedia. On the WikiMedia page I found and old discussion started by Larry Sanger in 2001. My interest in networked knowledge development is piqued and I'm hoping this page will be allowed to stand and those much more knowledgeable about both epistemology and Wikipedia will find it a useful place to add their input. --ggatin (talk) 08:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gating, I am late in offering feedback on this article. My apologies. I think you have chosen a fascinating topic, but also a very challenging one. I'm very interested to see where you go with this.

At present, I think you would do well to add a little context. The second paragraph, in particular, seems rather opaque, unless one has a pretty strong grounding in the discipline of epistemology and its ontology.

I see that your link to a similarly-titled essay on Meta Wiki was removed. (Your link went to the essay's talk page; I think you may have meant to link directly to the essay: The epistemology of Wikipedia) But this essay would not meet [[WP:RS|Wikipedia's standard of a "reliable source." This is an unusual case -- the self-referential nature of the topic adds some complexity! But what we really need to add is a source, ideally from the early 2000s, in a peer reviewed or other independent publication, asserting that there are interesting questions at the intersection of Wikipedia and epistemology.

I'm curious about your plans going forward. Are there other papers or articles you have collected that you will be incorporating? Or do you plan to delve more deeply into the ones you've already cited? -Pete (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if you're still working on this, but it's an interesting topic and I think probably deserving of an article (although obviously this can be improved!). Relevant link for you: Every Point of View (as opposed to NPOV) http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter/2013/February#.22Distributed_Wiki.22_proposal_to_replace_NPOV_with_.22every_point_of_view_.28EPOV.29.22 / Sjgknight (talk) 15:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epistemology of Wikipedia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130622155902/http://www.ascilite.org.au:80/ajet/ajet25/ruth.html to http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/ruth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]