Jump to content

Talk:Cleopatra Selene II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Cleopatra was the "younger twin"? I've always thought that twins have the same age...--Vermondo 23:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, well they don't exactly come out side-by-side... — Laura Scudder 03:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no documentation of which was born first (though it seems that a common assumption/misconception is that the male of a set of boy-girl twins is always born first). Either way, I changed it.204.10.247.1 (talk) 00:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She is born 40 BC, marries around 20 BC and gets her children twenty years and more later at an age of 40 plus? The sources for these dates need checking. Highly unusual and also unlikely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.37.181.81 (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Death date?

[edit]

It is written that Cleopatra Selene II survived to adulthood, married, had children, died and was buried in a tomb that still exists (at least in part). Can any of the experts in this area of history provide an estimated year of death for her? I don't see one. (71.22.47.232 (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Identity of her daughter

[edit]

The name of her daughter has been suggested as Drusilla, but sources state that the information is open to interpretation. See Selen for instance. Given the apparent competing theories I personally think that should be reflected in the article. --AnnekeBart (talk) 03:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Her brothers

[edit]

The statement in this article that Alexander Helios and Ptolemy Philadelphos were dead at the time of this Cleopatra's marriage are the opposite of the statement in the Alexander Helios article, which says that they were alive. Since the Alexander Helios article cites a source (Cassius Dio) and this one doesn't, I think this is the entry that should be amended to reconcile the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pugnaciousignatius (talkcontribs) 20:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Cleopatra Selene II which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.bible-history.com/images/cleoptra/cleopatra_selene_bust.jpg
    Triggered by \bbible\-history\.com\b on the local blacklist
  • http://www.bible-history.com/images/cleoptra/selene_coin2.jpg
    Triggered by \bbible\-history\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:09, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]